Troutman Sanders

JANUARY 11, 2021

On December 15, 2020, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals decided four cases which all dealt with the issue of standing within the context of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”). State Collection Service Inc. The Spuhlers alleged in their complaint that State Collection Service, Inc. (“SCS”) In Bazile v.

Accrued Interest 52

Accrued Interest Judgment Fair Debt Collection Law Firms 52

Consumer Financial Services Law

JANUARY 3, 2018

By Zachary Dunn The FDCPA prohibits a debt collector from using “any false, deceptive, or misleading representation” in connection with the collection of a debt. and Bank of America responded by placing Islam’s account with American Recovery Service (“ARS”) for collection. See 15 U.S.C. In Islam v.

Accrued Interest 40

Accrued Interest Debt collector Banks Creditors 40

FDCPA Defense

FEBRUARY 1, 2018

Attorneys and other entities that regularly engage in collection work for community associations may be subject to the requirements of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. as well as analogous state laws governing the consumer collection process. The issue in Ho v.

Accrued Interest 40

Accrued Interest Foreclosure Debt collector Debtor 40

FDCPA Defense

AUGUST 22, 2016

Hollins Law Firm , _F.3d There, the collection law firm defendant communicated with plaintiff on a number of occasions, and each time the firm identified itself as a “debt collector,” as required by section 1692e(11) of the FDCPA. 3d _, 2016 WL 4174747 (9th Cir.

Debtor 40

Debtor Debt collector Law Firms Accrued Interest 40