This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The controversial ruling, which pertains to the treatment of municipal revenue debt, has left investors with questions about the value and significance of a revenue pledge in a municipal bankruptcy. The ruling reversed long-held practice as to the mandatory application of special revenues following municipal bankruptcy. Background.
Preparing for a future that would need to include litigating collections from a diverse portfolio of creditor sources (credit card, medical, bankruptcy, student loan, subrogation, commercial – just to name a few) became more and more pragmatic as the years of the recession marched forward.
Johns University School of Law American Bankruptcy Institute Law Review Staff Section 363(m) of title 11 of the United States Code (the Bankruptcy Code) sets boundaries in a courts ability to modify or reverse certain sales and corresponding assumption or rejection of unexpired leases. [1] Bella Garabedian St. 1] In Swiss Re Corp.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 19,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content