This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has upheld a ruling in favor of a defendant that was sued for violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, deciding that a default judgment obtained in state court is “conclusive” from the perspective of establishing the facts of a case.
A District Court judge in Pennsylvania has certified a class action in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act lawsuit that accused a defendant of violating the statute by mentioning in a letter that a judgment may be awarded before the expiration of a settlement offer that was being made, even though a collection lawsuit had … The post Judge Certifies (..)
A District Court judge in Missouri has granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment after a plaintiff filed two separate lawsuits related to two different collection letters that she received five months apart attempting to collect on the same debt. A copy of the ruling in the case of Branum v.
If you have ever listened to an attorney on one of my webinars talk about the differences between filing a motion to dismiss and a motion for summary judgment, they will tell you that the motion for summary judgment allows them to gather evidence, such as deposing the plaintiff.
A District Court judge in Texas has partially granted a defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings after it was sued for violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act in how it attempted to collect on a judgment. A copy of the ruling in the case of Kranz v.
Despite making many arguments to the contrary, a District Court judge in New Jersey has granted summary judgment to the defendant in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case, ruling the plaintiffs now lack standing to sue in federal court, even though a class had previously been certified in the case.
A Magistrate Court judge in Colorado has granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case on the grounds that it was entitled to the “bona fide error” defense after it was accused of misrepresenting the debt that the plaintiff owed.
On October 15, 2020, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau filed a proposed stipulated final judgment and order to settle its lawsuit against Encore Capital Group, Inc., and its subsidiaries.
A District Court judge in Missouri has granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case, ruling that the plaintiff lacked standing and that the defendant did not violate the FDCPA.
In collections, we often have to weigh risk and reward and make similar calculations. When trying to decide what the riskier or safer course of action is, we consider not only the amount of money owed, but also the specific debtor company and management, the business sector and the economy in general. Does the reward justify the risk?
Everyone in the debt collection industry is familiar with the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act (FDCPA). Reputable collections agencies willingly follow these rules and treat patients with compassion and respect. Preferred Collection and Management Services, Inc. Now the FDCPA is in the news again.
Goldome Realty Credit Corp., 1st DCA 1992) (providing that where the borrower filed for bankruptcy after a default judgment of foreclosure, the lender was able to sever its claim for enforcement of the personal guaranty and pursue the personal guarantor). See, e.g. , Guirlinger v. 2d 1135, 1136 (Fla. This prevents a double recovery.
It is a prudent creditmanager that attempts to obtain personal guarantees from the principals of an incorporated entity to which credit is being extended. Guarantees can be classified as being either guarantees of payment or guarantees of collection, and the distinction is important to recognize.
2017) regarding revival warnings in collections letters on time-barred debt. Midland CreditManagement, Inc. The ruling resulted in summary judgment as to liability for a certified class of plaintiffs due to a collection agency failing to include a warning that payment could revive the statute of limitations on time barred debt.
The main options available are: Instruct a debt collection agency that has the time, expertise and resources to recover your debt. Make sure you fully understand the charging structure before agreeing and use an agency that is registered with the Credit Services Association. which secures repayment of the debt when the asset is sold.
To retain existing staff and attract new employees, companies need to look at ways to appeal to the remote working mindset while also managing salary expectations. Creditmanagement firms have been left in a particularly tough position. Optimise your team with the right creditmanagement software.
Trust your judgment in making decisions that are in the best interests of your business. Trust your training, and the skills you have acquired as credit professionals, and take the opportunity to learn more. The post Back yourself to win – by Sue Chapple FCICM appeared first on Chartered Institute of CreditManagement.
I assist troubled companies that have poor credit policies and are trying to improve their accounts receivable. In 30 years of doing so, I frequently encounter stressed out creditmanagers. The creditmanager is taking heat for the companies’ cash flow troubles. Is billing slow to issue credits?
Midland Funding, LLC, Midland CreditManagement, Inc., The stipulated final judgment and order will require the defendants to pay $79,308.81 The post CFPB settles lawsuit filed against debt collectors and debt buyers for alleged violations of CFPA, FDCPA, and 2015 consent order appeared first on Collection Industry News.
Midland CreditManagement, Inc. In Preston , the debt collector sent a collection letter that was inside of an envelope, which itself was inside another envelope. ” with no other reference to the creditor in the collection letter, was insufficient to meet the FDCPA’s standard. Niagra Credit Sols.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit recently vacated judgment in favor of a debt collector against putative class action claims raised by a consumer that its collection letter violated the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) by threatening action that could not legally be taken and amounting to a false representation.
While many consumers are able to manage their debt load and stay current on their accounts, many businesses are finding themselves with uncollected debt and no proven collection strategy. Before you can collect on any debt, you need to validate the debt in accordance with the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.
The law requires the agencies to conduct a “reasonable reinvestigation” when borrowers complain of inaccuracies in their credit report. The post 7th Circuit Says Credit Agencies Need Not Dig Into Debt Ownership appeared first on Collection Industry News. Brennan, joined by Circuit Court Judges Diane Wood and Amy St.
5] In an attempt to discharge her student loan debts, she also filed a complaint against, among others, the United States of America (collectively, the “Defendants”), seeking a discharge under section 523(a)(8). [6] 7] The debtor disagreed and filed a cross motion for Summary Judgment. [8]. United States Dep’t of Educ. , 523(a)(8)).
Section 1692g requires that within five days of the “initial communication with a consumer in connection with the collection of any debt” a collector must send the consumer a written notice containing, inter alia , the amount of the debt, and the name of the creditor to whom the debt is owed. See 15 U.S.C. 1692g(a)(1), (2). 1692g(a)(4).
A District Court judge in California has denied a plaintiff’s motion for default judgment and granted a defendant’s motion to set aside default in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case, ruling that the defendant was not properly served and had demonstrated a meritorious defense.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 19,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content