This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The Attorney General of Georgia yesterday announced a settlement with a creditor accused of engaging in deceptive sales and marketing tactics while also allegedly violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act that will see the company pay nearly $150,000 in fines while also agreeing to make significant changes to its business operations.
A collection attorney in New York is facing a class-action lawsuit for allegedly violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act and state law when attempting to collect on judgments owed to a bankrupt for-profit university. The background: Technical Career Institutes, Inc.
A complaint has been filed in federal court in California accusing a number of healthcare providers and a collection agency of violating state law as well as the FairDebtCollection Practices Act by attempting to collect on a debt that was incurred as a result of injuries suffered while the plaintiff was working and … The post Complaint Accuses (..)
The background: This past March, the plaintiff received a collection letter from the defendant, stating that the plaintiff owed $1,740. The plaintiff also lodged complaints with both the Better Business Bureau and the state dental board, arguing that the original creditor had engaged in illegal double billing.
A District Court judge in New York has ruled in favor of the defendants in two separate FairDebtCollection Practices Act cases, determining that entities that purchase debts do not have to disclose the chain of title detailing how they came to acquire those debts in the initial collection letters.
An Appeals Court in Washington state has upheld a lower court’s dismissal of a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case that accused a creditor of violating the statute by attempting to collect in a name different than its own. A copy of the ruling in the case of Morgan v.
Appeals Court Upholds Ruling For Creditor in RFDCPA Case first appeared on AccountsRecovery.net. Appeals Court Upholds Ruling For Creditor in RFDCPA Case appeared first on AccountsRecovery.net. ” … The post Calif. ” … The post Calif. The post Calif.
A District Court judge in Oklahoma has granted a defendant’s motion to dismiss a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruling the defendant did not violate the statute because it failed to notify the original creditor that the debt had been disputed by the plaintiff.
A District Court judge in Wisconsin has granted a defendant’s motion to dismiss after it was sued for violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act because it allegedly failed to correctly identify the creditor to whom a debt was owed in a collection letter. … The post Wisc.
Judge Denies Defendant’s Motion in FDCPA BK Case; Creditor Fined $10k For CollectingDebts in Different Name appeared first on AccountsRecovery.net. Judge Denies Defendant’s Motion in FDCPA BK Case; Creditor Fined $10k For CollectingDebts in Different Name appeared first on AccountsRecovery.net.
A District Court judge granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruling that the plaintiff’s claims were barred because they should have been addressed in an earlier case instead of a separate lawsuit being filed.
A District Court judge in Michigan has granted a defendant’s motion to dismiss after it was sued for allegedly violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act by contacting the plaintiff after she had disputed the debt in question with the original creditor and for making a “hard inquiry” on her credit report.
A District Court judge in New York has granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act class action case, determining that the plaintiff lacked standing to sue because he did not suffer a concrete injury after alleging the defendant violated the statute by sending a collection letter to the … The (..)
A District Court judge in New York has agreed to adopt a Magistrate Judge’s recommendation that a defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings be granted after it was sued for violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act because it allegedly did not properly identify the creditor to whom a debt was owed in a … The post Judge (..)
A District Court judge in Wisconsin has granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act class-action case, determining that the plaintiff lacked standing to sue because he took no action to clarify his confusion over whom he should pay after receiving a collection letter from the defendant.
A District Court judge in Florida has granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, while also pointing out that the legal theory put forth by the plaintiff’s attorney has been “tartly” rejected by other courts and “does not improve by repetition.”
A District Court judge in California has granted a defendant’s motion to dismiss after it was accused of violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act and the Rosenthal FairDebtCollection Practices Act by attempting to collect on a debt that had been discharged in bankruptcy.
CREDITOR FACING PAIR OF LAWSUITS FOR VIOLATING REG F’S 7-IN-7 PROVISION A pair of lawsuits have been filed against a creditor, accusing it of violating the Rosenthal FairDebtCollection Practices Act because the creditor allegedly violated the 7-in-7 call frequency restrictions of Regulation F in attempting to collect on an unpaid debt.
A District Court judge in New Jersey has granted a defendant’s motion to dismiss after it was sued for allegedly violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act because the plaintiff claimed the amount cited as being owed in a collection letter was inaccurate and that the plaintiff did not owe the debt to the current … The post Judge Grants (..)
Suit Accuses Collector of Failing to Identify Creditor; Collector Not Liable for Wrong-Number Calls first appeared on AccountsRecovery.net. Suit Accuses Collector of Failing to Identify Creditor; Collector Not Liable for Wrong-Number Calls appeared first on AccountsRecovery.net. The post Daily Digest – November 18.
Class Action Accuses Collector of Using Inaccurate Creditor Name; State Court Judge Dismisses Suit for Lack of Standing first appeared on AccountsRecovery.net. Class Action Accuses Collector of Using Inaccurate Creditor Name; State Court Judge Dismisses Suit for Lack of Standing appeared first on AccountsRecovery.net.
In a case that was defended by Jin Shin and the team at Malone Frost Martin, a District Court judge in Illinois has reversed himself and granted a defendant’s motion for reconsideration, undoing class certification and summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff, and awarding summary judgment to the defendant in a FairDebtCollection … (..)
The background: The plaintiff claimed that the defendant attempted to collect a debt that it had purchased from the original creditor. The background: The plaintiff claimed that the defendant attempted to collect a debt that it had purchased from the original creditor. The ruling: Judge Jamel K.
COLLECTOR NOT OBLIGATED TO NOTIFY CREDITOR OF DISPUTE A judge in Oklahoma has granted a motion to dismiss, ruling the defendant was not obligated under the FairDebtCollection Practices Act to notify the original creditor that a debt was being disputed.
The Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on Friday partially reversed the dismissal of a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case over whether the plaintiff meets the statute’s definition of “consumer” and whether the debt is still a debt. Read the ruling.
Navigating the new world of digital collections can be tricky and is opening up new litigation doors that the industry has never really had to deal with before. The background: Back in April, the plaintiff received a collection letter from the defendant for an unpaid debt owed to a pest control company. Learn more.
A copy of the … The post Judge Partially Grants MSJ for Plaintiff in FDCPA Case Over Collecting Incorrect Amount appeared first on AccountsRecovery.net.
A District Court judge in Minnesota has awarded 25% of the attorney’s fees sought by the plaintiff in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruling the plaintiff’s request unreasonable for a number of reasons. The background: The case stemmed from attempts to collect on a 2007 mortgage loan.
A District Court judge in Maryland has granted a motion to dismiss claims that a creditor and a collection law firm violated the FairDebtCollection Practices Act and state consumer protection laws, ruling that the plaintiffs allegations failed to plausibly demonstrate any unlawful conduct.
The Federal Trade Commission has filed a lawsuit and received a temporary restraining order freezing the assets and taking control over a Georgia-based debtcollection agency, Global Circulation, Inc., after it was accused of using deceptive and abusive tactics to collectdebts from consumers.
A District Court judge in Arizona has granted a defendant’s motion to dismiss a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruling that the plaintiff failed to sufficiently establish the defendant’s status as a “debt collector” under the statute and did not plead adequate facts to support the alleged violations.
A District Court judge in Indiana has granted a defendant’s motion to dismiss after it was sued for violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act because the internal account numbers it referenced in two collection letters — seeking to collect the same debt owed to the same creditor — were different.
The background: The case stems from a debt incurred by the plaintiff following medical care at a hospital. The plaintiff argued that the debt should have been covered by Washington’s Medicaid plan or through charity care, and thus she did not owe it.
While noting that several instances of a collection letter lacked clarity, a District Court judge in New Jersey nonetheless granted a defendant’s motion to dismiss a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruling that even a least sophisticated consumer would be able to ascertain the identity of the original creditor and that disputes needed (..)
A District Court judge in California has granted a defendant’s motion to dismiss after it was sued for allegedly violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act because it identified the creditor and the original creditor in a letter, but did not identify the current creditor to whom the debt was owed, with the judge ruling … The post (..)
A class-action lawsuit has been filed against a collection agency for allegedly violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act by having multiple addresses on a collection letter it sent and not explicitly communicating to which address disputes or requests for original creditor information should be sent.
More bankruptcies mean higher charge-offs for creditors and increased reliance on third-party collection agencies. With this uptick, regulatory scrutiny may rise, leading to more complaints and lawsuits under laws like the FDCPA (FairDebtCollection Practices Act) and Regulation F due to errors in handling bankrupt debt.
A District Court judge in California has denied a defendant’s motion to compel arbitration in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruling that the collection law firm’s actions were independent of the original creditor, and thus not subject to the original agreement’s arbitration clause.
A District Court judge in Illinois has granted a plaintiff’s motion to remand a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case back to state court, while denying the motion for attorney fees and costs, after the plaintiff received two collection emails from the defendant in which the name of the original creditor was slightly different in … The (..)
Email has come a long way from the mass blast messagingdeveloping, customizing, and optimizing intelligent email strategies has shown success in both engagement and repayment rates in debtcollection. Why is Email Critical in Collection Communications? Use Cases and TrueAccord Success Stories Surveys show 59.5%
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 19,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content