This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The Federal Trade Commission has filed a lawsuit and received a temporary restraining order freezing the assets and taking control over a Georgia-based debtcollection agency, Global Circulation, Inc., after it was accused of using deceptive and abusive tactics to collectdebts from consumers.
A Magistrate Court judge in Utah has partially granted a plaintiff’s motion to compel several collection operations to comply with subpoenas in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case in which the defendants are attempting to argue they do not meet the statute’s definition of a debtcollector.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is back with another blog post warning consumers about unfair debtcollection practices, this time surrounding being contacted while at work. This follows a post from a couple of weeks ago about junk fees that can be assessed by debtcollectors.
Native American communities are disproportionately impacted by medical debt, with systemic billing and reimbursement issues leading to wrongful collections and credit reporting that violate federal law. By the numbers: Zoom in: Missteps in the PRC billing process often result in delayed payments or wrongful collections.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau yesterday announced it had filed a lawsuit against a debtcollector, accusing it of violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act and Consumer Financial Protection Act by sending collection letters using the letterheads of its clients — district attorneys’ offices — to collect on outstanding (..)
A state Appeals Court in California has upheld a ruling from a lower court compelling a debtcollector to comply with a subpoena it received from four District Attorney’s offices in the state investigating the collector’s compliance with the Rosenthal FairDebtCollection Practices Act and the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
ACA International on Friday sent out an alert to its members letting them know that the association, on behalf of one of its members, has filed a lawsuit seeking to block the enactment of debtcollection rules that are slated to go into effect in New York City in December.
A class action lawsuit has been filed in North Carolina federal court against a hospital network and the collection agency it uses, accusing them of violating state law in North Carolina as well as the FairDebtCollection Practices Act by overcharging him for a visit to the emergency room and using “aggressive, manipulative, and … The (..)
The Attorney General of Georgia has announced a settlement with a company that was accused of violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act and state law in Georgia that will see the company turn over $19.8 million worth of accounts and pay a fine of $41,500.
A District Court judge in Arizona has granted a defendant’s motion to dismiss a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruling that the plaintiff failed to sufficiently establish the defendant’s status as a “debtcollector” under the statute and did not plead adequate facts to support the alleged violations.
A District Court Judge in Washington has granted a motion to dismiss filed by all the defendants in a Fair Credit Reporting Act and FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruling that the plaintiff failed to adequately allege that the defendants actions were impermissible under the law. Learn more.
A District Court judge in Florida has denied a defendant’s motion to dismiss claims it violated the FairDebtCollection Practices Act and the Florida Consumer Collections Practices Act in a ruling that seems potentially problematic in terms of the definition of debtcollector and when a debt is in default.
Don’t look now, but there was an enforcement action involving a debtcollection company announced by a federal regulator. The claims: The complaint accuses the defendants of multiple illegal practices. First, they allegedly misrepresented themselves as attorneys or members of a law firm.
STUDENT LOAN COLLECTION BILL INTRODUCED IN COLORADO Legislators in Colorado are moving forward with a bill aimed at overhauling student loan collection in the state, which, if enacted would create several conflicts with the Colorado FairDebtCollection Practices Act for debtcollectors.
The Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has affirmed a lower court’s ruling for the plaintiffs in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case over convenience fees, ruling loan servicers are prohibited from charging anything not expressly authorized by the underlying agreement or permitted by law. Learn more.
A bill has been introduced in Congress that would expand the FairDebtCollection Practices Act to cover small business debts in order to protect those companies from “harassment” by third-party debtcollectors, according to the bill’s sponsor.
The second time before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals turned out to be the charm for a debtcollector that was accused of violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act by attempting to collect more than what was owed after a hospital made a billing error.
Suit Accuses Collector of Attempting to Collect on Non-Existent Lease; Cap One to Pay $2M to Settle Collection Enforcement Action first appeared on AccountsRecovery.net. The post Daily Digest – December 16.
When is a communication from a debtcollector not an attempt to collect a debt? If it says so in a letter to an attorney representing a consumer, is that enough?
Debtcollectors, for as long as the FairDebtCollection Practices Act has been in effect, have had rules about when it is ok and when it is not ok to speak with consumers.
A District Court judge in Maryland has granted a defendant’s motion to dismiss a FairDebtCollection Practices Act lawsuit after it was accused of not responding to a validation request from the consumer, pointing out that the defendant doesn’t necessarily have to respond, as long as it doesn’t attempt to collect on the debt.
A District Court judge in Mississippi has approved a settlement in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act class action that will see the defendant pay $14,000 to the plaintiffs and their attorneys. The $14,000 settlement includes $8,000 in compensation for the class members and $6,000 to cover attorney fees. Learn more.
The Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has overturned a lower court’s ruling in favor of the defendant in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruling that the defendants lack of knowledge about a prior dispute did not absolve it of its obligations under the FDCPA.
ROBBIN LAW: After the New York Attorney General Letitia James (NYAG) recent crack downs on debtcollectors violations of New Yorks Exempt Income Protection Act (EIPA), the NYAG has provided debtors with a guide on their rights under the EIPA. More details here. WHAT THIS MEANS, FROM JACQUELYN DICICCO OF J. More details here.
This includes debtcollectors and their compliance with the FairDebtCollection Practices Act, which … The post CFPB Releases Supervisory Highlights, Spotlight Issues Found During Examinations of Collection Operations appeared first on AccountsRecovery.net.
A Magistrate judge in Texas has recommended that a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case against a first-party debtcollector be dismissed because the plaintiff did not do enough to argue that the defendant meets the definition of debtcollector under the statute.
A District Court judge in Michigan has denied a defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruling that the defendants attempt to impose a 5% interest rate on the debt without clear contractual or legal authorization may constitute a violation of the FDCPA.
Congress made a mistake when it drafted Section 1692c(b) of the FairDebtCollection Practices Act, which prohibits communicating information about a debt with third parties because the way the statute is written, “there would be no corporate debtcollectors because debtcollectors would violate the FDCPA ever single time they communicated about (..)
There are countless myths about debtcollectors and the debtcollection industry as a whole. Debtcollections in many circumstances can be a complex situation for both the business trying to recover money and the consumer trying to navigate financial difficulty. Can a business pursue additional legal action?
The background: The case originated when the plaintiff’s delinquent account was placed with the defendant for collection in July 2021. Beginning in September of that year, the defendant began reporting the debt to credit reporting agencies.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau wants debtcollectors to know that if they are collecting or attempting to collectdebts on behalf of nursing home clients that require caregivers to personally guarantee payment of a resident’s bills — which violates federal law — the collector may be in violation of the FairDebtCollection (..)
The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has overturned a lower court’s ruling that a debtcollector did not violate the FairDebtCollection Practices Act when it sent an individual’s personal information to a letter vendor to have a collection letter sent to that person.
In a case that was defended by the team at Martin Golden Lyons Wats Morgan, a District Court Judge in Colorado has granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act lawsuit, ruling that the debtcollector did not violate the statutes debt verification requirements.
Preferred Collection and Management Services, a class-action lawsuit has been filed in New York federal court accusing a debtcollector of violating Section 1692c(b) and 1692f of the FairDebtCollection Practices Act … The post First Class-Action Suit, post-Hunstein, Filed in N.Y.
The number of 1692c(b) lawsuits alleging that a debtcollector communicated information with a third party in violation of the FairDebtCollection Practices Act continues to explode in the weeks following the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals’s ruling in Hunstein v.
The Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has affirmed a lower court’s ruling in favor of the defendant in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act and Telephone Consumer Protection Act case, ruling that the plaintiff failed to provide sufficient evidence to support his claims.
A Magistrate Court judge in Nevada has partially granted a plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case — but only on the grounds that there are no genuine issues of material fact that the plaintiff is a consumer, the defendant is a debtcollector, and the debt in question …
Thanks to the team at Ballard Spahr for noticing that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau filed an amicus brief in support of a debtcollector’s position that it did not violate the FairDebtCollection Practices Act when it included line items indicating that an individual owed $0.00
The number of class-action lawsuits accusing debtcollectors of violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act by communicating with a third party — a letter vendor — about the existence of a debt when it sent the plaintiff’s personal information to the vendor to be included in and mailed out as a collection letter continues … The post Webinar (..)
A District Court judge in Washington has denied a defendant’s motion to dismiss after it was sued for allegedly communicating information about a debt with an unauthorized third party that printed and mailed a collection letter to the plaintiff, ruling that the language of the FairDebtCollection Practices Act “bars debtcollectors from (..)
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 19,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content