This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
A District Court judge in Virginia has dismissed the majority of claims against several defendants in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act class-action lawsuit, but allowed one key claim against a collection agency to proceed. Bank National Association. Learn more.
A District Court judge in Oklahoma has dismissed the class-action component of a FairDebtCollection Practices Act lawsuit, while also dismissing some of the claims, after the defendant was accused of not sending a collection lawsuit summons to the plaintiff’s correct address, which it allegedly had.
Is the choice made by a collection operation to dismiss a collection lawsuit against a consumer a decision in the consumer’s favor? The background: The defendant filed a lawsuit against the plaintiff in 2018 over an alleged credit card debt.
A California Appeals Court has reversed a lower court’s ruling in favor of a collection law firm and debtcollection operation that were sued for violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act (FDCPA), ruling that the public interest exception to the state’s anti-SLAPP law applies to the case.
10509, the Comprehensive DebtCollection Improvement Act. This legislation, first introduced in 2021, seeks to modernize federal debtcollection laws while offering stronger protections for consumers facing various types of debt. Maxine Waters [D-Calif.],
A District Court judge there has granted a defendant’s motion to dismiss a FairDebtCollection Practices Act lawsuit on the grounds that the plaintiff lacked standing because he had the claim assigned to him by the individual who actually owed the debt in question.
The credit and collection sector could be next. Why it matters: As collection agencies, debt buyers, fintechs, banks, and credit unions seek to improve consumer engagement, LLMs offer a potential solution for more natural and effective communication. What’s next: Just as LLMs in AVs operate within certain parameters (e.g.,
The background: This past March, the plaintiff received a collection letter from the defendant, stating that the plaintiff owed $1,740. The plaintiff contends that the defendant engaged in harassment (1692d) and misrepresentation (1692e) by repeatedly attempting to collect on a debt that it knew was already paid.
A District Court judge in Oklahoma has dismissed yet another “inconvenient” time or place case under the FairDebtCollection Practices Act in which a plaintiff mails a letter to the defendant requesting or demanding that all future contact between the parties be conducted via email, ruling that both the FDCPA and Regulation F gave the (..)
A District Court judge granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruling that the plaintiff’s claims were barred because they should have been addressed in an earlier case instead of a separate lawsuit being filed.
A District Court judge in California has granted a defendant’s motion to dismiss after it was accused of violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act and the Rosenthal FairDebtCollection Practices Act by attempting to collect on a debt that had been discharged in bankruptcy.
Don’t look now, but there was an enforcement action involving a debtcollection company announced by a federal regulator. The claims: The complaint accuses the defendants of multiple illegal practices. First, they allegedly misrepresented themselves as attorneys or members of a law firm.
The background: The plaintiff alleged she was subjected to repeated collection calls sometimes multiple times per day and more than seven calls in a week to her personal cell phone using an automated telephone dialing system (ATDS) and in which prerecorded messages were used.
A Magistrate Court judge in Utah has partially granted a plaintiff’s motion to compel several collection operations to comply with subpoenas in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case in which the defendants are attempting to argue they do not meet the statute’s definition of a debt collector.
ACA International on Friday sent out an alert to its members letting them know that the association, on behalf of one of its members, has filed a lawsuit seeking to block the enactment of debtcollection rules that are slated to go into effect in New York City in December.
A District Court judge in New York has denied motions for summary judgment filed by the plaintiff and the defendant in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case over the garnishment of a bank account that may have included funds that were exempt seeking to pay a rental debt from more than two decades ago. […]
A collection attorney in New York is facing a class-action lawsuit for allegedly violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act and state law when attempting to collect on judgments owed to a bankrupt for-profit university. The background: Technical Career Institutes, Inc.
A District Court judge in Montana has awarded a plaintiff more than $15,000 in fees and damages in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case after the defendant allegedly withdrew $240 in extra payments after the debt had been settled.
This appears on its face to be a FairDebtCollection Practices Act class-action lawsuit that should serve as a reminder that when making calls to consumers, either double check the time zones or only make calls when all time zones are inside the appropriate window to be contacted. Learn more.
A District Court judge in Maryland has denied a defendant’s motion to compel arbitration in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act (FDCPA) case, ruling that the defendant waived its right to arbitrate by engaging in prior litigation. Learn more.
The California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation yesterday announced three enforcement actions against different debtcollection operations, for attempting to collect in the state without having or applying for a license and also making false or misleading representations when attempting to collect on a debt i n violation of the Fair (..)
A District Court judge in New Jersey has denied a defendant’s motion to dismiss and a motion for sanctions against the plaintiff in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case that is accusing a law firm of improperly adding a collection fee in an itemization table included in a summons that was attempting to recover … The post Judge Denies (..)
The background: The plaintiff claimed that the defendant attempted to collect a debt that it had purchased from the original creditor. The background: The plaintiff claimed that the defendant attempted to collect a debt that it had purchased from the original creditor. The ruling: Judge Jamel K.
… The post Judge Partially Denies MJOP in FDCPA, TCPA Case Over Collection Texts first appeared on AccountsRecovery.net. The post Judge Partially Denies MJOP in FDCPA, TCPA Case Over Collection Texts appeared first on AccountsRecovery.net.
A collection operation is facing a FairDebtCollection Practices Act lawsuit for sending a letter to the plaintiff attempting to collect on an unpaid insurance debt because it should have known that the plaintiff was the victim of identity theft and fraud from “sophisticated con-artists in a widespread fraudulent scheme.”
A District Court judge in Indiana has granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruling the plaintiff did not suffer a concrete injury after receiving two collection letters from the defendant on the same day — each signed by a different attorney.
Suit Accuses Collector of Attempting to Collect on Non-Existent Lease; Cap One to Pay $2M to Settle Collection Enforcement Action first appeared on AccountsRecovery.net. The post Daily Digest – December 16.
A state Appeals Court in Wisconsin has affirmed the certification of a class in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, agreeing with the lower court that the plaintiff’s claims were not mooted by an offer of individual relief made by the defendant.
A copy of the … The post Judge Partially Grants MSJ for Plaintiff in FDCPA Case Over Collecting Incorrect Amount appeared first on AccountsRecovery.net.
The threshold for establishing that you suffered a concrete injury in violation of the FairDebtCollection Practices Act upon receiving a collection letter may be higher than its ever been for a plaintiff, but I think everyone can agree that claiming you did not even appear to read it is going to cause problems … The post Not Reading Collection (..)
A District Court judge in Illinois has granted a defendant’s motion to dismiss a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruling the plaintiff lacked standing after alleging violations related to a disputed debt originating from identity theft.
A District Court judge in Michigan has denied a defendant’s motion to dismiss and stayed a case in which the defendant is accused of violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act and state law in Michigan while a state court determines whether or not the underlying debt is for personal or business reasons.
In a case that was defended by the team at Barron & Newburger, the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has reversed a lower court’s ruling in favor of a plaintiff in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act (FDCPA) case over the timing of when the defendant notified credit reporting agencies that the debt […]
The Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has upheld a ruling in favor of a defendant that was sued for violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act, deciding that a default judgment obtained in state court is “conclusive” from the perspective of establishing the facts of a case.
A California Appeals Court has overturned a lower court’s dismissal of a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruling that even a mistaken attempt to collect a debt from the wrong person can be subject to liability.
A District Court judge in Florida has granted a plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruling that a collection law firm used an invalid garnishment order to collect on the subject debt. The decision, issued by Judge William F. Learn more.
A District Court judge in Michigan has granted a defendant’s motion to dismiss a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case on the grounds that not removing a dispute notification on the plaintiff’s credit report is not a false or misleading statement in connection with the collection of a debt.
A collector is being sued for violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act because it attempted to collect a debt that the plaintiff alleges he did not incur. The background: The plaintiff received a phone call from the defendant last month, seeking to collect on an unpaid utility debt.
Native American communities are disproportionately impacted by medical debt, with systemic billing and reimbursement issues leading to wrongful collections and credit reporting that violate federal law. By the numbers: Zoom in: Missteps in the PRC billing process often result in delayed payments or wrongful collections.
Collection Firm Accused of Sending MVN to Represented Individual; Judge Denies Motion to Remand FDCPA Case Back to State Court appeared first on AccountsRecovery.net.
Frost Echols, representing the defendant a collection agency in this case, discovered the irregularities after attempting to depose the plaintiff. The law firm agreed to pay a total of $50,000, with $35,000 going to the collection agency defendant and $15,000 to the plaintiff. Read the consent decree.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 19,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content