This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Today’s webinar just happens to be on the topic of legal collections (register here) so it’s entirely timely to write about a court ruling involving a judgment. The background: The plaintiff alleged that the defendant violated the FDCPA by failing to notify him that the debt in question was time-barred.
A collection attorney in New York is facing a class-action lawsuit for allegedly violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act and state law when attempting to collect on judgments owed to a bankrupt for-profit university. The background: Technical Career Institutes, Inc.
The Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has upheld a ruling in favor of a defendant that was sued for violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act, deciding that a default judgment obtained in state court is “conclusive” from the perspective of establishing the facts of a case.
A collection operation is facing a FairDebtCollection Practices Act class action lawsuit for not adjusting the post-judgment interest rate after the state of Kentucky changed the maximum rate that could be charged seven years ago, according to a copy of the complaint.
Is the choice made by a collection operation to dismiss a collection lawsuit against a consumer a decision in the consumer’s favor? The background: The defendant filed a lawsuit against the plaintiff in 2018 over an alleged credit card debt.
A District Court judge in Kentucky has partially granted and partially denied a collection attorney’s motion to dismiss a FairDebtCollection Practices Act lawsuit, ruling that the attorney’s motion for default judgment in an underlying collection case was “improper” because the plaintiff had filed a response to the suit.
A District Court judge in New York has denied motions for summary judgment filed by the plaintiff and the defendant in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case over the garnishment of a bank account that may have included funds that were exempt seeking to pay a rental debt from more than two decades ago. […]
The Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has vacated a judgment in favor of a plaintiff who alleged a debt buyer violated the FairDebtCollection Practices Act because the collection agency it used to collect on an unpaid debt contacted the plaintiff even though she was represented by an attorney — a fact … The post Appeals Court Vacates (..)
A District Court judge in Nevada has dismissed – with prejudice – a plaintiff’s class-action complaint that a defendant violated the FairDebtCollection Practices Act by filing renewals for a judgment on an untimely basis, ruling that the defendant renewed the judgments within the window set forth by state law.
Better late than never, a federal judge in Nevada has ruled, denying a motion for default judgment against a defendant in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case because the defendant has now starting to defend itself “in earnest.” ” A copy of the ruling in the case of Hankerson v.
A District Court judge in Indiana has granted a motion to vacate a default judgment that was entered against a defendant in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruling that the plaintiff never properly served the defendant with the summons and complaint, after the defendant removed the case to federal court.
A District Court judge granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruling that the plaintiff’s claims were barred because they should have been addressed in an earlier case instead of a separate lawsuit being filed.
A District Court judge in North Carolina has granted a defendant’s motion for relief from judgment on the grounds that a default judgment obtained by the plaintiff in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case is void due to lack of service of process. A copy of the ruling in the case of Becvar v.
A District Court judge in California has granted a defendant’s motion to dismiss after it was accused of violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act and the Rosenthal FairDebtCollection Practices Act by attempting to collect on a debt that had been discharged in bankruptcy.
A District Court judge in Pennsylvania has certified a class action in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act lawsuit that accused a defendant of violating the statute by mentioning in a letter that a judgment may be awarded before the expiration of a settlement offer that was being made, even though a collection lawsuit had … The post Judge Certifies (..)
Is it possible for an individual to sue a debt collector for violating the Fair Credit Reporting Act and FairDebtCollection Practices Act for allegedly attempting to collect a debt that the individual believes he did not owe, when the individual took no action against the original creditor for placing the allegedly illegitimate debt … The post (..)
The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has affirmed a lower court’s ruling denying a debt collector’s motion for relief from a judgment because of “gross negligence” by its attorney for failing to respond to a motion for summary judgment filed by the plaintiff in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act lawsuit that ultimately (..)
A District Court judge has granted a defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings after it was sued by a brother and sister for allegedly violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act by discussing the sister’s debt with the brother, but only after the brother used the sister’s personal information — the last four digits (..)
In a case that was defended by Rick Perr and Monica Littman of Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck, a District Court judge in New York has granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a class-action FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruling the plaintiff lacked standing to sue because he did not suffer a concrete … The post Judge (..)
In a case that was defended by the team at Malone Frost Martin, a District Court judge has granted a defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings in a FairDebtCollection Practices class action after alleging that the amount owed listed in a collection letter was lower than it should have been and that … The post Judge Grants Motion (..)
A District Court judge in Ohio has granted a defendant’s motion to vacate an entry of default that was filed against it in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruling that the defendant’s failure to respond to the plaintiff’s complaint did not constitute culpable conduct and that the case should be decided on its merits.
The background: The plaintiff, a former tenant, filed the lawsuit against after receiving a letter from the defendant offering to settle her outstanding rent debt for roughly half the amount owed.
A District Court judge in Florida has granted a plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruling that a collection law firm used an invalid garnishment order to collect on the subject debt. The decision, issued by Judge William F. Learn more.
JUDGE GRANTS MTD IN FDCPA CASE OVER LACK OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE ON MVN We were so close to what I think would have been our first ruling on the safe harbor of using the Model Validation Notice, but a District Court judge in Utah ruled a plaintiff lacked standing to pursue his FairDebtCollection … The post Daily Digest – December 28.
The post Judge Grants Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment in FDCPA, FCRA Case Over Complaint Sent to Empty Office appeared first on AccountsRecovery.net.
Receiving one phone call and six messages from a collector after notifying it that she was being represented by an attorney is not enough to warrant the $25,000 in emotional distress being sought by the plaintiff in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruled a Magistrate Judge, saying that the amount was “pulled out … The post Judge (..)
A District Court judge in New York has granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment after it was sued for a laundry list of alleged violations of the FairDebtCollection Practices Act in a letter that was sent to the plaintiff while also declining a motion from the plaintiff to strike an affidavit and … The post Judge Grants MSJ for (..)
… The post Judge Partially Denies MJOP in FDCPA, TCPA Case Over Collection Texts first appeared on AccountsRecovery.net. … The post Judge Partially Denies MJOP in FDCPA, TCPA Case Over Collection Texts first appeared on AccountsRecovery.net.
A District Court judge in Illinois has granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment after it was sued for allegedly violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act, ruling that the defendant was engaged in early-out collections and that it was not attempting to collect on a debt that was in default when it contacted the … The post (..)
A District Court judge in Indiana has granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruling the plaintiff did not suffer a concrete injury after receiving two collection letters from the defendant on the same day — each signed by a different attorney.
A District Court judge in Maryland has granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case that centers over the language used by the plaintiff and whether it constituted a dispute of the debt or not. I decline to pay this debt.”
A copy of the … The post Judge Partially Grants MSJ for Plaintiff in FDCPA Case Over Collecting Incorrect Amount appeared first on AccountsRecovery.net. A copy of the … The post Judge Partially Grants MSJ for Plaintiff in FDCPA Case Over Collecting Incorrect Amount appeared first on AccountsRecovery.net.
A District Court judge in Washington has partially granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment while denying a plaintiff’s motion for the same ruling in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case in which the defendant attempted to collect a debt from the plaintiff, who claims not to have incurred the debt in question.
When is a communication from a debt collector not an attempt to collect a debt? If it says so in a letter to an attorney representing a consumer, is that enough?
The background: The case stems from a debt incurred by the plaintiff following medical care at a hospital. The plaintiff argued that the debt should have been covered by Washington’s Medicaid plan or through charity care, and thus she did not owe it. Learn more.
Over time, they neglected to pay the maintenance and cable fees for the property, and the homeowners association hired the defendant, a collection law firm, to collect the outstanding fees. Despite the plaintiffs attempts to resolve the situation, including contacting the HOA for payment details, the fees went unpaid.
A District Court judge in Wisconsin has denied a defendant’s motion for summary judgment after it was sued for allegedly violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act because it attempted … The post Judge Denies Defendant’s MSJ in FDCPA Case Seeking to Collect on Canceled Debt appeared first on AccountsRecovery.net.
A District Court judge in Washington has denied a defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act class-action case over alleged “junk” fees, ruling that the plaintiffs adequately pleaded plausible claims under the FDCPA and related state consumer protection laws.
A Magistrate Court judge in Wisconsin has denied a plaintiff’s motion to alter a judgment which ruled he did not have standing to pursue claims the defendant violated the FairDebtCollection Practices Act, finding that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a concrete injury that could be linked to the defendant’s alleged misconduct.
The background: The case stemmed from a series of communications between the plaintiff and the defendant, a debtcollection company. This past July, the defendant sent the plaintiff a text message seeking payment for a debt tied to a cell phone account. The ruling: Judge Douglas R.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 19,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content