This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
A District Court judge in New Jersey has granted a defendant’s motion to dismiss a third-party complaint filed against it by a collectionlawfirm over issues with a wage garnishment. The background: The dispute began when the plaintiff, a consumer, owed a debt which the lawfirm was assigned to collect.
A District Court judge in Florida has granted a plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case, ruling that a collectionlawfirm used an invalid garnishment order to collect on the subject debt. The decision, issued by Judge William F. Learn more.
A District Court judge in Nevada has granted a defendant’s motion to dismiss after it was accused of garnishing the plaintiff’s wages without first domesticating the judgment in that state. After the judgment was assigned to the defendant, it sought to enforce the judgment by garnishing the plaintiffs wages. Judge Andrew P.
The Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has affirmed a lower court’s ruling in favor of a plaintiff who accused a collectionlawfirm of violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act by obtaining a writ of garnishment in the wrong jurisdiction. A copy of the ruling in the case of Thompson v.
Don’t look now, but there was an enforcement action involving a debt collection company announced by a federal regulator. First, they allegedly misrepresented themselves as attorneys or members of a lawfirm. The claims: The complaint accuses the defendants of multiple illegal practices. Learn more.
Suit Accuses CollectionLawFirm of Garnishing Wages Without Permission Appeals Court Affirms Ruling for Defendant, But Says Plaintiff Could Have Had Standing New AI Agent Startup Promises Tech With Empathy Consumers Prioritizing Savings Over Debt for Tax Refunds: Survey WORTH NOTING: Highly effective communicators usually share these four habits … (..)
APPEALS COURT UPHOLDS RULING FOR PLAINTIFF IN FDCPA CASE OVER GARNISHMENT JURISDICTION The Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has affirmed a lower court’s ruling in favor of a plaintiff who accused a collectionlawfirm of violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act by obtaining a writ of garnishment in the wrong jurisdiction.
CollectionLawFirm Ordered to Pay Restitution; Previewing Tomorrow’s Hearing on Reforming the CFPB first appeared on AccountsRecovery.net. CollectionLawFirm Ordered to Pay Restitution; Previewing Tomorrow’s Hearing on Reforming the CFPB appeared first on AccountsRecovery.net.
EDITOR’S NOTE: This article is part of a series that is sponsored by WebRecon. WebRecon identifies serial plaintiffs lurking in your database BEFORE you contact them and expose yourself to a likely lawsuit. Protect your company from as many as one in three new consumer lawsuits by scrubbing your consumers through WebRecon first. Want to learn more?
Appeals Court Affirms Ruling Over Default Judgment The Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has upheld a ruling in favor of a defendant that was sued for violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, deciding that a default judgment obtained in state court is conclusive from the perspective of establishing the facts of a case.
A District Court judge in Arizona has granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case, ruling that it is entitled to the statute’s bona fide error defense after garnishing a bank account where Social Security payments were deposited to satisfy a judgment. Learn More.
A District Court judge in Arizona has granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case, ruling that it is entitled to the statute’s bona fide error defense after garnishing a bank account where Social Security payments were deposited to satisfy a judgment. Learn More.
That said, let me walk you through all the elements of this particular email that tip it off as a scam: From: Sherrill Green <SherrillGreen@outlook.com> Wait, the prestigious “Webster LawFirm” doesn’t have it’s own domain and you’re using a generic outlook.com account? That’s odd.
Judge Dismisses Remaining FDCPA Claim in BK Case A District Court judge in Illinois has dismissed the remaining claim in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case against a defendant, citing a lack of subject matter jurisdiction because the plaintiff lacked standing to sue. Collection Professionals, Inc. More details here.
Courts have long debated the extent to which a debt collection attorney’s representations to opposing counsel or the court during the course of litigation may violate the FDCPA and the results from different circuits have varied greatly. The case arose from the lawfirm’s post judgment efforts to garnish wages.
The company, creditor or collection agency has legal ways to pursue payment. The judgment creditor can then use that court judgment to try to collect money from you. Common methods include wage garnishment , property attachments and property liens. These laws vary. This is known as wage garnishment.
The Rodenburg LawFirm (Rodenburg), whose primary business is debt collection, held a Commercial Umbrella Liability Policy with The Cincinnati Insurance Company (Cincinnati Insurance) that obligated Cincinnati Insurance to indemnify Rodenburg for liability to third parties for certain defined injuries.
The Eleventh Circuit recently joined the First and Eighth Circuits in concluding that the FDCPA’s venue provision does not apply to post-judgment garnishment proceedings. Post judgment, the lawfirm filed a garnishment proceeding against the consumer’s bank seeking to collect on the judgment. 1692i(a)(2).
There are two circumstances in which your employer could find out about your Chapter 7 bankruptcy: In a Chapter 7 bankruptcy, your employer would know only if you were already having your wages garnished by creditors (called wage attachment). Again, this does not mean that you will lose your job.
The court order aims to halt the defendants’ alleged deceptive and abusive debt collection practices. The defendants allegedly misrepresented themselves as lawfirms and used various fictitious business names to bolster their credibility. They also misrepresented themselves as attorneys and lawfirms.
Rodenburg LawFirm is available at: Link to Opinion. In Minnesota, a creditor may issue a garnishment summons to any third party “at any time after entry of a money judgment in [a] civil action.” The Eighth Circuit found that Creditor’s mailing of the garnishment summons on Debtor caused him no tangible injury.
This is known as wage garnishment. The Consumer Credit Protection Act caps these types of garnishments. Nonwage garnishment. If you’re retired, unemployed, or self-employed, your bank account may be garnished instead. Veterans payments, social security, and disability benefits are not eligible for nonwage garnishment.
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, is a collection agency that buys old debts from lenders and companies that have been unable to collect the debt themselves. In other words, when the original creditor has been unsuccessful in collecting on a debt, it will write off the debt as a loss. Ask Lex Law for Help.
It’s important to respond to any communications and document each step of the process when resolving your outstanding debt through a debt collection attorney. Because of their involvement in collecting money you owe a creditor, you may be contacted via a phone call or a letter from a debt collection attorney.
Having debt in collections can be downright overwhelming, especially when debt collectors bombard you with dozens of phone calls. What you may not know is that you are protected by the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), a law designed to keep third-party debt collectors in check when they contact you. Table of Contents.
New business debt collection may be the last thing on your mind as you juggle all the different moving parts the come with starting a business. If you are in the process of starting a new business, debt collection on past due accounts is likely not even on your radar yet. 1: I Will Lose Customers If I Push Too Hard to Collect.
When the time comes to return to normalcy, you should be prepared to return to business as usual, including collecting any outstanding debt you may currently be owed. Navigating this with the help of an experienced collection attorney is critical, and the Law Offices of Alan M. Cohen LLC can provide you with just that.
The experienced collection attorneys at the Law Offices of Alan M. Collection agencies are passive organizations that make the same effort you were making before you brought them on board. Why Hire a Collections Attorney? An experienced collections attorney will do more than merely advise you on what you need to do.
Mario Barboza was a resident of Collin County, Texas when Pharia, LLC, successor in interest to defendant Pallida LLC, filed a collections action in 2010 in Denton County, Texas to recover the balance due on Barboza’s credit card. In early 2011, a default judgment was obtained against Barboza. Barboza), thus 1692i(a) did not apply.
Mario Barboza was a resident of Collin County, Texas when Pharia, LLC, successor in interest to defendant Pallida LLC, filed a collections action in 2010 in Denton County, Texas to recover the balance due on Barboza’s credit card. In early 2011, a default judgment was obtained against Barboza. Barboza), thus 1692i(a) did not apply.
Introduction: The debt collection industry plays a vital role in the global economy, helping businesses recover outstanding debts and maintain financial stability. This presents a substantial opportunity for debt collection agencies to assist lenders in recovering unpaid debts and managing default risks.
Guidance: Opting for a course from an established bankruptcy lawfirm often means gaining financial skills guidance from professionals well-versed in bankruptcy law and processes. There are some key differences between these two types of bankruptcy.
Attorneys who regularly engage in collection work for community associations have increasingly become targets for lawsuits filed by professional consumer attorneys under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA” or “the Act”), 15 U.S.C. and analogous state laws. Are You Engaged In “Debt Collection” Under The FDCPA?
When you file for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, the Court will place an automatic stay upon filing, which stops creditors from collecting payments, garnishing wages, or repossessing property. And a significant amount of time comes from mandatory waiting periods required by the law. However, every case is different.
New Yorkers facing debt-collection lawsuits are poised to get a little extra help in the wake of a federal court’s ruling — and some observers say it could translate to a win for consumers across the country who have basic legal questions but can’t afford a lawyer. Source: site.
Every case is unique, and every case merits the careful consideration of a lawfirm dedicated to providing specialized bankruptcy solutions. After Filing for Bankruptcy, am I Still Able to Own Property? Lastly, Do I require Legal Counsel to File for Bankruptcy?
State Activities: On February 28, New York AG Letitia James (D) announced that her office secured more than $650,000 from a debt collectionlawfirm and its subsidiary for filing allegedly frivolous lawsuits and “harming … New Yorkers.” s Municipal Regulations.
On October 30, the FTC announced that it had banned the owner of a small business funding company from both the merchant cash advance and debt collection industries.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 19,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content