This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
A collection attorney in New York is facing a class-action lawsuit for allegedly violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and state law when attempting to collect on judgments owed to a bankrupt for-profit university. The background: Technical Career Institutes, Inc.
Today’s webinar just happens to be on the topic of legal collections (register here) so it’s entirely timely to write about a court ruling involving a judgment. The debt originated from a judgment obtained back in December 2008. Sometimes it’s better to be lucky than good.
And as a collection agency working with small businesses and large organizations, it is a must for us to carry out our mission. When calling a consumer about a past due bill, regardless if it’s the business or a debt collection professional, we must give that consumer our full attention. And it’s vital in debt collections.
The Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has upheld a ruling in favor of a defendant that was sued for violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, deciding that a default judgment obtained in state court is “conclusive” from the perspective of establishing the facts of a case.
A collection operation is facing a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act class action lawsuit for not adjusting the post-judgment interest rate after the state of Kentucky changed the maximum rate that could be charged seven years ago, according to a copy of the complaint.
A District Court judge in New Jersey has granted a defendant’s motion to dismiss a third-party complaint filed against it by a collection law firm over issues with a wage garnishment. The background: The dispute began when the plaintiff, a consumer, owed a debt which the law firm was assigned to collect.
A District Court judge in Kentucky has partially granted and partially denied a collection attorney’s motion to dismiss a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act lawsuit, ruling that the attorney’s motion for default judgment in an underlying collection case was “improper” because the plaintiff had filed a response to the suit.
The collection of post-judgment interest is in the news, and is being cited as a relic of “a different era” which can cost the amount of debt owed by an individual to “balloon in a way that makes it hard to” repay.
A District Court judge in Nevada has dismissed – with prejudice – a plaintiff’s class-action complaint that a defendant violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act by filing renewals for a judgment on an untimely basis, ruling that the defendant renewed the judgments within the window set forth by state law.
Better late than never, a federal judge in Nevada has ruled, denying a motion for default judgment against a defendant in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case because the defendant has now starting to defend itself “in earnest.” ” A copy of the ruling in the case of Hankerson v.
A state appeals court in Washington has affirmed an attorney’s fee award for the plaintiff in a debt collection case, agreeing with the lower court that counterclaims brought by the defendant, a collection operation, were frivolous. The key findings included: Learn more.
A District Court judge in Indiana has granted a motion to vacate a default judgment that was entered against a defendant in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case, ruling that the plaintiff never properly served the defendant with the summons and complaint, after the defendant removed the case to federal court.
Is the choice made by a collection operation to dismiss a collection lawsuit against a consumer a decision in the consumer’s favor? The plaintiff contested the collection effort, raising objections to the defendants complaint. The objections were sustained and the defendant was given the opportunity to amend its complaint.
A District Court judge in North Carolina has granted a defendant’s motion for relief from judgment on the grounds that a default judgment obtained by the plaintiff in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case is void due to lack of service of process. A copy of the ruling in the case of Becvar v.
The Supreme Court of New Mexico has ruled that employees of a credit union engaged in the unauthorized practice of law by filing collection lawsuits to recover unpaid debts. The Court emphasized that under New Mexico law, only licensed attorneys may represent entities in court, including filing lawsuits and pursuing legal judgments.
Judge Grants Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment; Proposed Law Would Limit Collections in Florida For Crime-Incurred Debts first appeared on AccountsRecovery.net. Judge Grants Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment; Proposed Law Would Limit Collections in Florida For Crime-Incurred Debts appeared first on AccountsRecovery.net.
A District Court judge in Pennsylvania has certified a class action in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act lawsuit that accused a defendant of violating the statute by mentioning in a letter that a judgment may be awarded before the expiration of a settlement offer that was being made, even though a collection lawsuit had … The post Judge Certifies (..)
She sought damages for these alleged injuries, asserting violations of the FDCPA: A District Court judge granted summary judgment for the defendant, ruling that the interest rate the defendant attempted to collect did not constitute a violation of the FDCPA.
Is it possible for an individual to sue a debt collector for violating the Fair Credit Reporting Act and Fair Debt Collection Practices Act for allegedly attempting to collect a debt that the individual believes he did not owe, when the individual took no action against the original creditor for placing the allegedly illegitimate debt … The post (..)
The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has affirmed a lower court’s ruling denying a debt collector’s motion for relief from a judgment because of “gross negligence” by its attorney for failing to respond to a motion for summary judgment filed by the plaintiff in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act lawsuit that ultimately (..)
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau yesterday announced a settlement with the National Collegiate Student Loan Trusts (NCSLTs) to resolve allegations of defective debt collection practices. If approved by the court, the stipulated judgment will require the NCSLTs to provide $2.25
A District Court judge in Ohio has granted a defendant’s motion to vacate an entry of default that was filed against it in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case, ruling that the defendant’s failure to respond to the plaintiff’s complaint did not constitute culpable conduct and that the case should be decided on its merits.
In a case that was defended by Rick Perr and Monica Littman of Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck, a District Court judge in New York has granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a class-action Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case, ruling the plaintiff lacked standing to sue because he did not suffer a concrete … The post Judge (..)
In a case that was defended by the team at Malone Frost Martin, a District Court judge has granted a defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings in a Fair Debt Collection Practices class action after alleging that the amount owed listed in a collection letter was lower than it should have been and that … The post Judge Grants Motion (..)
A District Court judge granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case, ruling that the plaintiff’s claims were barred because they should have been addressed in an earlier case instead of a separate lawsuit being filed.
The Attorney General of Arizona on Friday announced that the defendants in a lawsuit filed by its office have reached a consent judgment that will see the defendants pay $1.6 million in restitution to those impacted by the debt collection scam, up to $900,000 in civil penalties, and a permanent ban for the owner of … The post Ariz.
A District Court judge in California has granted a defendant’s motion to dismiss after it was accused of violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act by attempting to collect on a debt that had been discharged in bankruptcy. Learn more.
JUDGE GRANTS MTD IN FDCPA CASE OVER LACK OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE ON MVN We were so close to what I think would have been our first ruling on the safe harbor of using the Model Validation Notice, but a District Court judge in Utah ruled a plaintiff lacked standing to pursue his Fair Debt Collection … The post Daily Digest – December 28.
The post Judge Grants Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment in FDCPA, FCRA Case Over Complaint Sent to Empty Office appeared first on AccountsRecovery.net.
Time might finally be running out on Douglas MacKinnon’s attempts to keep from having to produce a list of his assets to settle a $60 million judgment.
The legal system is an “ineffective vehicle” for collecting unpaid debts for both plaintiffs and defendants, according to research conducted by the Utah Bar Foundation, in conjunction with Pew Charitable Trusts, showing that showing up to defend against a collection lawsuit often leads to more debt while judgments obtained by plaintiffs (..)
The Governor of New York yesterday signed a trio of consumer protection bills into law, including a debt collection bill called the Consumer Credit Fairness Act that lowers the statute of limitations, increases the amount of information needed when filing collection lawsuits, and institute specific requirements when seeking default judgments.
A District Court judge in Nevada has blocked the Federal Trade Commission’s attempt to use the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act to collect on a judgment against a defendant in an enforcement action, who was found liable by a judge back in 2013 for $1.5 The Background: Back in 2011, the FTC accused a […]
A District Court judge in New York has denied motions for summary judgment filed by the plaintiff and the defendant in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case over the garnishment of a bank account that may have included funds that were exempt seeking to pay a rental debt from more than two decades ago. […]
… The post Judge Partially Denies MJOP in FDCPA, TCPA Case Over Collection Texts first appeared on AccountsRecovery.net. … The post Judge Partially Denies MJOP in FDCPA, TCPA Case Over Collection Texts first appeared on AccountsRecovery.net.
A company that made cash advances to small businesses has reached a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission that will see the defendants pay $675,000 while also being permanently banned from participating in any debt collection activities. A copy of the stipulated order for permanent injunction and monetary judgment in the case of FTC v.
Securing a judgment against a debtor is a significant victory, but the battle doesnt end there. Collecting on that judgment requires finding the money, sometimes by uncovering the debtors assets. This process is known as post-judgment asset discovery. Successful debt collection also requires persistence.
A District Court judge in Florida has granted a plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case, ruling that a collection law firm used an invalid garnishment order to collect on the subject debt. The decision, issued by Judge William F. Learn more.
A District Court judge in Illinois has granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment after it was sued for allegedly violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, ruling that the defendant was engaged in early-out collections and that it was not attempting to collect on a debt that was in default when it contacted the … The post (..)
A District Court judge in Indiana has granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case, ruling the plaintiff did not suffer a concrete injury after receiving two collection letters from the defendant on the same day — each signed by a different attorney.
A District Court judge in Nevada has granted partial summary judgment to both the plaintiff and the defendant in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case, ruling that while the defendant’s actions in obtaining a default judgment were improper, the subsequent attempts to collect the debt were permissible under the law.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 19,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content