This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
A District Court judge in New Jersey has granted a defendant’s motion to dismiss a third-party complaint filed against it by a collectionlawfirm over issues with a wage garnishment. The background: The dispute began when the plaintiff, a consumer, owed a debt which the lawfirm was assigned to collect.
A District Court judge in Minnesota has denied a defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case, ruling the defendant — a lawfirm that specializes in representing landlords — meets the statute’s definition of a “debt collector.”
The Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has upheld a summary judgment ruling in favor of a lawfirm that was accused of violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act by suing an individual who was allegedly responsible for a medical debt incurred by his wife, before they divorced.
A class-action lawsuit has been filed in New Jersey by a plaintiff who claims that a debt buyer allegedly violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act because it did not have the proper license to authorize a collectionlawfirm to try and collect on a judgment in that state and that a letter sent … The post FDCPA Class Action Filed Against (..)
A District Court judge in Florida has granted a plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case, ruling that a collectionlawfirm used an invalid garnishment order to collect on the subject debt. The decision, issued by Judge William F. Learn more.
A District Court judge in Minnesota has awarded 25% of the attorney’s fees sought by the plaintiff in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case, ruling the plaintiff’s request unreasonable for a number of reasons. The background: The case stemmed from attempts to collect on a 2007 mortgage loan.
The background: The case arose from an attempt to collect a debt owed by the plaintiff, who had defaulted on a loan that was later purchased by the defendant, a debt buyer. The debt buyer referred the plaintiff’s account to a collectionlawfirm to pursue legal action. The ruling: In this ruling, Judge Anthony J.
Bank, CollectionLawFirm Facing FDCPA Class Action Over Reviving Dormant Judgments Judge Denies MSJ For Defendant in FCRA, FDCPA Case Over Disputed Debt More Americans Living Paycheck to Paycheck: Survey A Summary of Comments on Medical Debt Credit Reporting Proposal WORTH NOTING: The best Prime Day deals available so far … The best video […] (..)
A District Court judge in Maryland has granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case that centers over the language used by the plaintiff and whether it constituted a dispute of the debt or not. I decline to pay this debt.” ” The ruling: Judge Julie R.
Over time, they neglected to pay the maintenance and cable fees for the property, and the homeowners association hired the defendant, a collectionlawfirm, to collect the outstanding fees. Despite the plaintiffs attempts to resolve the situation, including contacting the HOA for payment details, the fees went unpaid.
A bankruptcy court judge in Virginia has ordered a collectionlawfirm to pay $25,000 in attorney’s fees to the plaintiffs for violating the discharge of a judgment through bankruptcy by sending a payoff letter to the plaintiffs after the plaintiff requested it. A copy of the ruling in the case of Skaggs v.
Appeals Court Affirms Ruling Over Default Judgment The Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has upheld a ruling in favor of a defendant that was sued for violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, deciding that a default judgment obtained in state court is conclusive from the perspective of establishing the facts of a case.
BANK ACCUSED IN FDCPA CLASS ACTION OF USING STRAW LAWFIRM TO COLLECT ON DEBT A patsy. A class action lawsuit is accusing a bank of using a lawfirm as a front to collect on its own debts, allegedly violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act by sending … The post Daily Digest – May 5.
Judge Awards $25k in Sanctions Against CollectionLawFirm; CFPB Launches Credit Card Review first appeared on AccountsRecovery.net. Judge Awards $25k in Sanctions Against CollectionLawFirm; CFPB Launches Credit Card Review appeared first on AccountsRecovery.net. The post Daily Digest – January 25.
The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has partially affirmed and partially reversed a lower court’s ruling in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case, determining that the District Court judge should not have granted summary judgment for a collectionlawfirm that “expressly” informed an individual in a collection letter that (..)
A District Court judge in Nevada has granted a defendant’s motion to dismiss after it was accused of garnishing the plaintiff’s wages without first domesticating the judgment in that state. The background: The case stemmed from a consumer credit card debt judgment originally obtained in Tennessee by a creditor.
EDITOR’S NOTE: This article is part of a series that is sponsored by WebRecon. WebRecon identifies serial plaintiffs lurking in your database BEFORE you contact them and expose yourself to a likely lawsuit. Protect your company from as many as one in three new consumer lawsuits by scrubbing your consumers through WebRecon first. Want to learn more?
The Supreme Court of Montana has affirmed a lower court’s ruling against a plaintiff’s attorney who filed suit against a debt collector, another attorney who was hired to collect on a judgment against the plaintiff’s attorney, and a lawfirm that had agreed to have its offices used for a deposition after a judgment was … The (..)
Merchant of the District Court for the Eastern District of New York issued the ruling, determining that the plaintiff failed to establish sufficient connections between the lawfirm and the state of New York to justify her authority over the defendant. Read on to hear what the experts have to say this week. More details here.
The Attorney General of New York yesterday announced an Assurance of Discontinuance with a collectionlawfirm and its subsidiary that will see it pay $655,600 in fines and restitution to consumers.
A District Court judge in Michigan has certifies a class in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case accusing a collectionlawfirm of charging excessive post-judgment interest on dozens of debt collection lawsuits across the state. In three of the cases, […]
A District Court judge in Wisconsin has denied a defendant’s motion for summary judgment after it was sued for allegedly violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act because it attempted … The post Judge Denies Defendant’s MSJ in FDCPA Case Seeking to Collect on Canceled Debt appeared first on AccountsRecovery.net.
When obtaining a judgment in a debt collection action and, thereafter, seeking to enforce that judgment, debt collectors must be aware of the EIPA and proceed accordingly. More details here. WHAT THIS MEANS, FROM JACQUELYN DICICCO OF J. More details here.
A District Court judge in Pennsylvania has denied a defendant’s motion to dismiss a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act class action lawsuit, ruling the plaintiff plausibly alleged violations of the statute after the defendant — a collectionlawfirm — allegedly edited an account statement to include additional fees.
A judgment is an order issued by a court of law. The company, creditor or collection agency has legal ways to pursue payment. If they are successful, the court issues a judgment against you. What Happens After a Judgment Is Entered Against You? You should receive a notice of the judgment entry in the mail.
A District Court judge in Arizona has granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case, ruling that it is entitled to the statute’s bona fide error defense after garnishing a bank account where Social Security payments were deposited to satisfy a judgment.
A District Court judge in Arizona has granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case, ruling that it is entitled to the statute’s bona fide error defense after garnishing a bank account where Social Security payments were deposited to satisfy a judgment.
Capouano, Beckman, Russell & Burnett LLC , the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit recently affirmed defendant lawfirm Capouano, Beckman, Russell & Burnett LLC’s (Firm) motion for summary judgment involving an alleged violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA).
That said, let me walk you through all the elements of this particular email that tip it off as a scam: From: Sherrill Green <SherrillGreen@outlook.com> Wait, the prestigious “Webster LawFirm” doesn’t have it’s own domain and you’re using a generic outlook.com account? That’s odd.
The Florida Supreme Court has published the proper form to use when seeking a final judgment of foreclosure: Form 1.996(a), Final Judgment of Foreclosure (8-18-20). What Does Form 1.996(a), Final Judgment of Foreclosure, Include? Plaintiffs in Hillsborough county must use the Uniform Final Judgment of Foreclosure form.
When a debtor owes a creditor money and the creditor is seeking assistance collecting the amount owed, the creditor can either use a collectionlawfirm or a collection agency. Lawfirms and collection agencies serve the same purpose initially.
In this case, a credit-reporting agency defending an FCRA case issued subpoenas to a consumer lawfirm to determine whether that firm was acting as a credit-repair organization and to learn about its process for creating and sending dispute letters on behalf of consumers. More details here.
Cohen & Associates LLC, our commercial collections attorneys have over five decades of commercial collections experience. Our firm’s attorneys relentlessly and aggressively pursue the collection of debts on behalf of our clients while maintaining the utmost ethical standards to do so. What is ethical debt collection?
5082, officially known as the “Practice of Law Technical Clarification Act of 2018,” to the full House of Representatives. Dunn The House Financial Services Committee voted 35-25 on March 21, 2018 to advance H.R.
A judgment is an order issued by a judge or jury to settle a lawsuit. In this case, the judge may order you to pay the other party as part of the court’s final judgment. The order can be issued in one of two forms: A monetary judgment: A judgment that orders one party to pay the other party a specific amount of money.
If you are having trouble collecting a commercial debt, you may wonder what you can do to make the debtor pay. The truth is, you have many tools available to you under Massachusetts law. The experienced commercial collections attorneys at the Law Offices of Alan M. Cohen LLC know how to choose the right tools for the job.
First, Judge Nelson found that there was a genuine issue of fact as to whether the defendant regularly engages in debt collection activities, a requirement for liability under the FDCPA. Learn more.
WHAT THIS MEANS, FROM JUSTIN PENN OF HINSHAW CULBERTSON: Too often the ARM industry finds itself defending federal litigation that arises out of unsuccessful state court collection lawsuits, and this case is helpful in at least two ways. First, it supports the notion that not all failed collection litigation should result in an FDCPA claim.
Judge Dismisses Remaining FDCPA Claim in BK Case A District Court judge in Illinois has dismissed the remaining claim in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case against a defendant, citing a lack of subject matter jurisdiction because the plaintiff lacked standing to sue. Collection Professionals, Inc. More details here.
On February 13, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of an Eastern District of New York court and found that the defendant lawfirm, Mandarich Law Group, LLC (Mandarich), had conducted a meaningful attorney review of the plaintiff debtor’s account prior to mailing her a debt collection letter on the firm’s letterhead.
When you’re attempting to collect a debt from a commercial customer, you know that every second counts. After all, the older the debt is, the harder it becomes to collect. When the traditional letters, phone calls, and negotiations fall short, it may be time to consider filing a debt collection lawsuit against your customer.
291 (1995), lawyers have known that if they seek to collect consumer debts for clients – even when doing so through litigation – they might qualify as a "debt collector" under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. Jenkins , 514 U.S. As confirmed by a recent decision from the Tenth Circuit, James v. Wadas , _ F.3d
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 19,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content