This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
A District Court judge in New Jersey has granted a defendant’s motion to dismiss a third-party complaint filed against it by a collectionlawfirm over issues with a wage garnishment. The background: The dispute began when the plaintiff, a consumer, owed a debt which the lawfirm was assigned to collect.
The case, which was filed in the Eastern District of Virginia, involved the lawfirm Guards Law. The controversy began when Guards Law allegedly filed a lawsuit and later settled another without the plaintiff’s consent or knowledge.
The Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has overturned a lower court’s ruling in favor of a collectionlawfirm that was sued for attempting to collect a debt from the spouse of the actual debtor, ruling that the lawfirm did not exhaust all of its efforts to collect from the actual debtor … The post Appeals Court Reverses Ruling in (..)
A state Appeals Court in Washington has partially affirmed — and partially overturned — a lower court’s dismissal of a case against a creditor and collectionlawfirm, ruling that the plaintiff pleaded sufficient facts to survive a motion to dismiss that the firm violated state law by not disclosing required information when filing (..)
A District Court judge in New York has sided with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and agreed to enforce a Civil Investigative Demand that was sent to a collectionlawfirm, a decision that the lawfirm’s lawyer has said will be appealed.
The Connecticut Department of Banking has fined a collectionlawfirm $100,000 — the maximum amount allowed by law — and ordered it to cease and desist from collecting in the state without a valid license. A copy of the enforcement order against the Law Offices of David M.
A debt buyer and collectionlawfirm in California have reached a settlement with a local District Attorney after being accused of suing an individual in an attempt to collect a debt that the individual did not owe, according to a published report.
A hospital and the collectionlawfirm it uses have removed a class-action lawsuit filed against them to federal court in New Jersey, after they were accused of violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act by including the plaintiff’s health insurance policy number on documents in (..)
A Maryland Appeals Court has issued a ruling in a case being heard in federal court, determining that lawfirms engaged in debt collection activities on behalf of a client are not subject to the Maryland Consumer Loan Law. A copy of the ruling, in the case of Nagle & Zaller v.
A trio of plaintiffs who unsuccessfully tried to sue a collectionlawfirm and three attorneys — who are facing charges for multiple felonies after allegedly forging proofs of service in collection lawsuits — in federal court have taken their case to state court, claiming violations of the Michigan Collection Practices Act.
The Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has upheld a summary judgment ruling in favor of a lawfirm that was accused of violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act by suing an individual who was allegedly responsible for a medical debt incurred by his wife, before they divorced.
DA REACHES $30K SETTLEMENT WITH DEBT BUYER, COLLECTIONLAWFIRM A debt buyer and collectionlawfirm in California have reached a settlement with a local District Attorney after being accused of suing an individual in an attempt to collect a debt that the individual did not owe, according to a published report.
A California Appeals Court has reversed a lower court’s ruling in favor of a collectionlawfirm and debt collection operation that were sued for violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), ruling that the public interest exception to the state’s anti-SLAPP law applies to the case.
A collectionlawfirm in New Jersey is facing a pair of class-action lawsuits that have been filed against it in Pennsylvania, accusing the firm of not sending mandatory notices required by law when suing individuals and for enrolling individuals in automatic payment plans without first obtaining their consent.
A District Court judge in Oklahoma has dismissed the class-action component of a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act lawsuit, while also dismissing some of the claims, after the defendant was accused of not sending a collection lawsuit summons to the plaintiff’s correct address, which it allegedly had.
A class-action lawsuit has been filed in New Jersey by a plaintiff who claims that a debt buyer allegedly violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act because it did not have the proper license to authorize a collectionlawfirm to try and collect on a judgment in that state and that a letter sent … The post FDCPA Class Action Filed Against (..)
A District Court judge in Ohio has dismissed three of the four counts requested by a collectionlawfirm being sued by a former employee who is accusing the firm of age discrimination and other claims, while also setting a date for a jury trial to begin in May on the remaining counts.
How the New Stimulus Bill Will Impact the ARM Industry; Judge Partially Grants MTD in Age Discrimination Suit Against CollectionLawFirm appeared first on AccountsRecovery.net.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has filed its response to an order to show cause, arguing that a collectionlawfirm should not be able to use the Supreme Court’s ruling in Seila Law v. CFPB to dismiss a lawsuit attempting to force the firm to respond to a Civil Investigative Demand letter.
The Connecticut Department of Banking has reduced the fine against a lawfirm that was operating in the state without a consumer collection agency license to $20,000 from $100,000, largely on the basis that the lawfirm is no longer in business. A copy of the order with the Law Offices of David M.
The Supreme Court yesterday denied a petition from a defunct collectionlawfirm fighting a Civil Investigative Demand from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, deciding that one challenge to the Bureau’s funding structure was enough for now.
The background: The case arose from an attempt to collect a debt owed by the plaintiff, who had defaulted on a loan that was later purchased by the defendant, a debt buyer. The debt buyer referred the plaintiff’s account to a collectionlawfirm to pursue legal action. Learn more.
Yale Weinstein, the president of Burton Neil & Associates, a collectionlawfirm in Pennsylvania has had his law license temporarily suspended while he is being investigated for alleged financial improprieties, according to a published report, and the firm’s website is now being directed to a different lawfirm, which notes that “Burton (..)
JUDGE SIDES WITH CFPB IN CID AGAINST COLLECTIONLAWFIRM A District Court judge in New York has sided with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and agreed to enforce a Civil Investigative Demand that was sent to a collectionlawfirm, a decision that the lawfirm’s lawyer has said will be appealed.
A bankruptcy court judge in Virginia has ordered a collectionlawfirm to pay $25,000 in attorney’s fees to the plaintiffs for violating the discharge of a judgment through bankruptcy by sending a payoff letter to the plaintiffs after the plaintiff requested it. A copy of the ruling in the case of Skaggs v.
A collectionlawfirm fighting a Civil Investigative Demand from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is planning on appealing its case to the Supreme Court, and has asked the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit to hold off issuing its final ruling in the case.
Don’t look now, but there was an enforcement action involving a debt collection company announced by a federal regulator. First, they allegedly misrepresented themselves as attorneys or members of a lawfirm. The claims: The complaint accuses the defendants of multiple illegal practices.
As expected, a collectionlawfirm that has been fighting a Civil Investigative Demand from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau for five years has submitted a petition to the Supreme Court to hear arguments in its case, positing that the funding structure of the agency violates the Appropriations Clause of the Constitution and renders the […] (..)
SoloSuit, a legal tech startup helping consumers resolve debt collection lawsuits, has named Attorney Yale R. Levy, founder of Levy & Associates, LLC, a multi-state collectionlawfirm, and former President of the National Creditors Bar Association (NCBA), brings decades of debt collection expertise to the company.
The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit today issued a ruling that upheld a lower court’s decision to grant a petition from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to enforce a Civil Investigative Demand against a collectionlawfirm, determining in the process that the funding structure of the Bureau is constitutional.
A District Court judge in Minnesota has awarded 25% of the attorney’s fees sought by the plaintiff in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case, ruling the plaintiff’s request unreasonable for a number of reasons. The background: The case stemmed from attempts to collect on a 2007 mortgage loan.
Supreme Court Denies Petition from CollectionLawFirm Challenging CFPB’s Funding Mechanism Judge Grants MSJ For Defendant in Class-Action Over Dispute Kansas Hospital Draws Attention Over Spike in Collection Lawsuits 22 Companies Seeking Collection Talent WORTH NOTING: Have someone in your life who is always traveling?
A District Court judge in New Jersey has denied a defendant’s motion to dismiss and a motion for sanctions against the plaintiff in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case that is accusing a lawfirm of improperly adding a collection fee in an itemization table included in a summons that was attempting to recover … The post Judge Denies (..)
Call … The post Bank Accused in FDCPA Class Action of Using Straw LawFirm to Collect on Debt first appeared on AccountsRecovery.net. The post Bank Accused in FDCPA Class Action of Using Straw LawFirm to Collect on Debt appeared first on AccountsRecovery.net. Want to learn more?
Judge Awards $25k in Sanctions Against CollectionLawFirm; CFPB Launches Credit Card Review first appeared on AccountsRecovery.net. Judge Awards $25k in Sanctions Against CollectionLawFirm; CFPB Launches Credit Card Review appeared first on AccountsRecovery.net. The post Daily Digest – January 25.
CollectionLawFirm Ordered to Pay Restitution; Previewing Tomorrow’s Hearing on Reforming the CFPB first appeared on AccountsRecovery.net. CollectionLawFirm Ordered to Pay Restitution; Previewing Tomorrow’s Hearing on Reforming the CFPB appeared first on AccountsRecovery.net.
The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld the dismissal of a pair of lawsuits filed against a collectionlawfirm that accused it of violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act because it included “disbursements” in a statement of claim document when collection lawsuits were filed against the plaintiffs, and because the debt buyer (..)
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau yesterday announced it had reached a proposed settlement with a collectionlawfirm that it sued in 2019, requiring the firm to pay a fine of $100,000, dismiss certain pending collection lawsuits, and ensure it possesses specific documents before filing collection lawsuits in the future.
CollectionFirm Accused of Sending MVN to Represented Individual; Judge Denies Motion to Remand FDCPA Case Back to State Court appeared first on AccountsRecovery.net.
CollectionLawFirm Facing FDCPA Class Action For Not Honoring Arbitration Request Collector Unable to Get All Claims Dismissed in Undated MVN Class Action Appeals Court Overturns $35M TCPA Settlement in Text Message Case Connecticut Governor Signs Medical Debt Credit Reporting Bill Into Law WORTH NOTING: ChatGPT is now going to be able to start […] (..)
LawFirm Facing Class Action; DFPI Announces Enforcement Actions first appeared on AccountsRecovery.net. LawFirm Facing Class Action; DFPI Announces Enforcement Actions appeared first on AccountsRecovery.net. The post Daily Digest – January 31.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 19,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content