This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
preempts burdensome credit reporting restrictions imposed by the Maine Fair Credit Reporting Act. “By The case is captioned Consumer Data Industry Association v. . § 1681, et seq. The parties filed cross-motions for judgment on a stipulated record in April 2020. This October, the U.S.
The plaintiff appealed, arguing that the lower court erred in finding that his RFDCPA claim failed to allege a “consumercredit transaction” as that term is defined under the statute. The court found it “irrelevant” that the plaintiff was never a party to the solar contract.
. § 1681, et seq. , preempts burdensome credit reporting restrictions imposed by the Maine Fair Credit Reporting Act. “By The case is captioned Consumer Data Industry Association v. The parties filed cross-motions for judgment on a stipulated record in April 2020. This October, the U.S.
Despite the liberal construction typically afforded to pleadings filed by pro se litigants, the court dismissed the plaintiff’s complaint sua sponte for failure to state a claim.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 19,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content