This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
A District Court judge in Florida has been forced to rule on competing motions for attorney’s fees in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case in which both sides are claiming victory, ruling partially in favor of both the plaintiff and the defendant.
A District Court judge in Florida has denied a defendant’s motion to dismiss claims it violated the FairDebtCollection Practices Act and the Florida ConsumerCollections Practices Act in a ruling that seems potentially problematic in terms of the definition of debt collector and when a debt is in default.
A District Court judge in Florida has denied a defendant’s motion to dismiss a class-action after it was sued for violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, and the Florida ConsumerCollection Practices Act for making calls to the plaintiff’s cell phone and leaving voicemails using pre-recorded (..)
CLASS-ACTION ACCUSES COLLECTOR OF VIOLATING FDCPA, FCCPA BY ADDING ‘ILLEGAL’ COLLECTION FEE A class-action lawsuit has been filed against a collection agency, accusing it of violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act and the Florida ConsumerCollection Practices Act because it allegedly added an “illegal” collection fee that represented (..)
A District Court judge in Florida has granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a class-action lawsuit involving alleged violations of the FairDebtCollection Practices Act and the Florida ConsumerCollection Protection Act.
The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld the summary judgment ruling in favor of a defendant that was sued for violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act and the Florida ConsumerCollection Practices Act because of alleged misrepresentations made by another entity that was collecting on the defendant’s behalf.
A District Court judge in Florida has granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment on most of the claims in a lawsuit accusing it of violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act and the Florida ConsumerCollection Practices Act by misrepresenting that the collector was an attorney and by using obscene and profane language during … (..)
Judge Grants MTD in FDCPA Case Over ID Theft A District Court judge in Illinois has granted a defendants motion to dismiss a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruling the plaintiff lacked standing after alleging violations related to a disputed debt originating from identity theft. More details here.
A District Court judge in Illinois has denied a healthcare provider’s motion to dismiss a claim it violated the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (ICFA) and a collection agency’s motion to strike class allegations it violated the FairDebtCollection Practices Act in a debt parking case on a medical debt.
Businesses throughout Florida should be aware of consumer statutes that provide remedies to consumers and impose liability to businesses, even for small technical violations. FairDebtCollection Practices Act. Florida ConsumerCollection Practices Act (FCCPA). Section 559.77 559.552, Fla. Conclusion.
Contact you at work if the debt collector knows or believes your employer prohibits personal calls. The Bureau educates, establishes and enforces rules, and has a compliance arm addressing debtcollection as it relates to consumercollections. The CFPB regulates debtcollection only as it relates to consumerdebt.
She advises clients and in-house counsel in litigation arising under the Truth in Lending Act, Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, Fair Credit Reporting Act, Florida ConsumerCollections Practices Act, FairDebtCollections Practices Act and the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, among others.
Collection agencies for small businesses are third-party establishments that collect overdue payments or funds from default accounts. What they can and cannot do when doing so are regulated by the FairDebtCollection Practices Act. How Small Businesses Proceed with Collections. The industry served.
Commonwealth is a third-party debt collector that specializes in the collection of past-due medical debts and furnishes information about consumercollection accounts to consumer reporting companies.
Agencies work on a contingency basis - they only get paid when the debt has been collected. However, a commercial collection agency is unlike a consumercollection agency. B2B Collection FDCPA and Regulations. You might be wondering which restrictions apply to commercial collection firms and agents.
A federal district court in the Middle District of Florida recently dismissed a pro se plaintiff’s FairDebtCollection Practices Act (FDCPA) and Florida ConsumerCollection Practices Act (FCCPA) action as time-barred because the defendants filed the foreclosure that was the basis for the plaintiff’s claims over four years prior.
The Florida ConsumerCollection Practices Act (FCCPA) and the FairDebtCollection Practices Act (FDCPA) are two pro-consumer statutes. Oftentimes, consumer lawyers bring claims for technical violations of the statutes, even when there are not any actual damages suffered by a consumer.
The Florida ConsumerCollection Practices Act (FCCPA) and the FairDebtCollection Practices Act (FDCPA) are two pro-consumer statutes. Oftentimes, consumer lawyers bring claims for technical violations of the statutes, even when there are not any real damages suffered by a consumer.
Nevertheless, there appears to be an increase in class action complaints alleging violations of consumer protection laws such as FairDebtCollection Practices Act (FDCPA), Florida’s ConsumerCollections Practices Act (FCCPA), Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), or Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA).
The Florida ConsumerCollection Practices Act (FCCPA) is a pro-consumer statute. Given the pro-consumer nature of the statute, one big consideration for defending against FCCPA claims is how to shift risk to the plaintiff. . As such, businesses need to be aware of the statute and the risk and liability of the statute.
However, in 2019, the First District Court of Appeals held that condominium assessments are considered “consumerdebts” under the Florida ConsumerCollection Practices Act (FCCPA) and the FairDebtCollection Practices Act (FDCPA). See Kelly v. Duggan , 282 So. 3d 969, 973 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019).
Here’s the background and all you need to know about what debt collectors can and can’t do on social media. In November 2021, The CFPB made some long-awaited updates to the FairDebtCollection Practices Act. These new CFPB rules apply only to consumercollections, not business-to-business collections.
Turner alleged those convenience fees violated the FDCPA, and its Florida counterpart, the Florida ConsumerCollection Practices Act (“FCCPA”). The court agreed with PHH, concluding that the convenience fees were not debts owed another as contemplated by the acts. PHH responded by moving to dismiss those claims. Freedom Mortg.
On February 17, 2012, the CFPB published its Proposed Rule Defining Larger Participants in Certain Consumer Financial Product and Service Markets. Entities in the debtcollection market that generate $10 million in annual receipts from consumercollection activities would be deemed a “larger participant” in the market.
The Florida ConsumerCollection Practices Act (FCCPA) and the FairDebtCollection Practices Act (FDCPA) are two pro-consumer statutes. Florida’s ConsumerCollection Practices Act (FCCPA) Part 1: Understanding the FCCPA (jimersonfirm.com) . Jimerson Birr (jimersonfirm.com).
BYL Collections isn’t a household name, but it collects for several businesses across multiple industries. Based in Westchester, Pennsylvania, BYL is a third-party collections agency that was founded in 1998. The agency specializes in consumercollections, commercial collections, and medical device recovery.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit recently held that periodic statements required by the federal Truth in Lending Act may violate the federal FairDebtCollection Practices Act if they are not truthful and fair. Source: site. A copy of the opinion in Lamirand, et al v. to be paid in one year.
Attorneys and other entities that regularly engage in collection work for community associations may be subject to the requirements of the FairDebtCollection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. as well as analogous state laws governing the consumercollection process.
A Florida Appeals Court has upheld the dismissal of a case that hinged on whether claims filed under the Florida ConsumerCollections Practices Act (FCCPA) were assignable to third parties. Learn more.
The plaintiff claimed that this late-hour email violated both the FDCPA and the Florida ConsumerCollection Practices Act (FCCPA), which restrict communications with consumers outside certain hours. Specifically, under both acts, a debt collector may not communicate with a consumer between 9 p.m.
The plaintiff was seeking assistance with personal legal matters, and the attorney and his firm provided legal representation related to the FDCPA and the Florida ConsumerCollection Protection Act. The background: The plaintiff, a Florida resident, originally sought legal representation from one of the defendants in October 2023.
Established by the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act, IPAC consists of 21 members, who serve staggered three-year terms and bring professional backgrounds in insurance accounting, actuarial science, academia, insurance regulation, and policyholder advocacy. For more information, click here.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 19,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content