This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has overturned a lower court’s ruling in favor of the defendant in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruling that the defendants lack of knowledge about a prior dispute did not absolve it of its obligations under the FDCPA.
District Court for the Eastern District of Texas granted the CFPBs unopposed motion for a 90-day stay in the litigation filed by Cornerstone CreditUnion League and Consumer Data Industry Association (the Plaintiffs). WHAT THIS MEANS, FROM AYLIX JENSEN OF MOSS & BARNETT: OnFebruary 6, the U.S. More details here.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) should ensure its debtcollection rulemakings do not extend unwarranted regulatory requirements to first-party debtcollectors, CUNA wrote Tuesday in response to a CFPB proposal.
15, 2022, the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council’s (FFIEC) Task Force on Consumer Compliance adopted revised examination procedures for the FairDebtCollection Practices Act (FDCPA) and its implementing regulation, Regulation F. A copy of the revised procedures can be accessed by clicking here. FFIEC is a U.S.
In a 9-3 vote earlier this month, the California Assembly Banking and Finance Committee approved legislation requiring a license for debtcollectors and debt buyers, entitled the DebtCollection Licensing Act (SB 908) (DCLA).
In addition to requesting a written validation notice from the collector, verify with your state attorney general’s office or the Better Business Bureau that the collection agency is legitimate. The FairDebtCollection Practices Act (FDCPA) provides protection for consumers. Creating a Debt Management Plan.
ConServe is a debtcollection agency that may contact you regarding unpaid debts. They are a third-party debtcollector, which means that they may be hired by your original creditor, or they may purchase your old debt on the chance that you pay them instead. How to Remove ConServe from Your Credit Report.
While consumer groups praised the bill for its recourse for consumers harassed by debtcollectors, CUNA and NAFCU saw the bill as complicating the legal relationship between consumers, members and lenders. Require debtcollectors to obtain consent before using electronic communications and provide written validation notices.
On January 2, the CFPB published a blog titled, “Holding DebtCollectors Responsible for False Statements.” CICA Collection Agency, a First Circuit case in which the CFPB has filed an amicus brief. The consumer sued to hold the debtcollector accountable for the misrepresentation, but the debtcollector pled ignorance.
If you have heard from a debtcollector called Rausch Sturm, you are probably being pursued for an old debt. You have also probably seen them appear on your credit report as a collections account. This is because Rausch Sturm has been hired by your original creditor to collect the debt on their behalf.
Supreme Court Rules CU Employees Engaged in Unauthorized Practice of Law When Filing Collection Suits Against Members The Supreme Court of New Mexico has ruled that employees of a creditunion engaged in the unauthorized practice of law by filing collection lawsuits to recover unpaid debts. More details here.
Major of the District Court for the Southern District of California denied the motion to compel with respect to RFPs related to the defendant’s debtcollection activities, finding that the scope of these requests was too broad and disproportionate to the needs of the case. The ruling: Judge Barbara L.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 19,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content