Creditors Fair Debt Collection Original Creditor 
Account Recovery
OCTOBER 3, 2022
A District Court judge in Oklahoma has granted a defendant’s motion to dismiss a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case, ruling the defendant did not violate the statute because it failed to notify the original creditor that the debt had been disputed by the plaintiff.
Account Recovery
JANUARY 13, 2023
Class Action Accuses Collector of Using Inaccurate Creditor Name; State Court Judge Dismisses Suit for Lack of Standing first appeared on AccountsRecovery.net. Class Action Accuses Collector of Using Inaccurate Creditor Name; State Court Judge Dismisses Suit for Lack of Standing appeared first on AccountsRecovery.net.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Account Recovery
OCTOBER 27, 2021
A District Court judge in Michigan has granted a defendant’s motion to dismiss after it was sued for allegedly violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act by contacting the plaintiff after she had disputed the debt in question with the original creditor and for making a “hard inquiry” on her credit report.
Account Recovery
OCTOBER 3, 2022
COLLECTOR NOT OBLIGATED TO NOTIFY CREDITOR OF DISPUTE A judge in Oklahoma has granted a motion to dismiss, ruling the defendant was not obligated under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act to notify the original creditor that a debt was being disputed.
Account Recovery
JUNE 1, 2021
A District Court judge in California has granted a defendant’s motion to dismiss after it was sued for allegedly violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act because it identified the creditor and the original creditor in a letter, but did not identify the current creditor to whom the debt was owed, with the judge ruling … The post (..)
Account Recovery
JUNE 1, 2021
NDCA Judge Grants MTD in FDCPA Case Over Creditor ID in Letter; Sixth Circuit Jumps on Standing Bandwagon appeared first on AccountsRecovery.net.
Troutman Sanders
SEPTEMBER 8, 2023
Although the credit union’s tradeline was updated to reflect that the account was “closed” and in collections, and the collection agency’s tradeline indicated that the credit union was the original creditor, both tradelines showed a balance, albeit for different amounts — $18,340 for the credit union and $20,875 for the collection agency.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
246 
Let's personalize your content