This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has affirmed a lower court’s ruling denying a debtcollector’s motion for relief from a judgment because of “gross negligence” by its attorney for failing to respond to a motion for summary judgment filed by the plaintiff in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act lawsuit that ultimately (..)
Is it possible for an individual to sue a debtcollector for violating the Fair Credit Reporting Act and FairDebtCollection Practices Act for allegedly attempting to collect a debt that the individual believes he did not owe, when the individual took no action against the original creditor for placing the allegedly illegitimate debt … The post (..)
A District Court judge in Michigan has denied a defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruling that the defendants attempt to impose a 5% interest rate on the debt without clear contractual or legal authorization may constitute a violation of the FDCPA.
In a case that was defended by the team at Martin Golden Lyons Wats Morgan, a District Court Judge in Colorado has granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act lawsuit, ruling that the debtcollector did not violate the statutes debt verification requirements.
ROBBIN LAW: After the New York Attorney General Letitia James (NYAG) recent crack downs on debtcollectors violations of New Yorks Exempt Income Protection Act (EIPA), the NYAG has provided debtors with a guide on their rights under the EIPA. More details here. WHAT THIS MEANS, FROM JACQUELYN DICICCO OF J. More details here.
So the district court correctly granted summary judgment to [the defendant].” The decision reinforces the standard that merely questioning a balance does not necessarily trigger the reporting requirements of Section 1692e(8) of the FDCPA. The plaintiff then appealed to the Tenth Circuit, which agreed with the lower courts assessment.
A Magistrate Court judge in Nevada has partially granted a plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case — but only on the grounds that there are no genuine issues of material fact that the plaintiff is a consumer, the defendant is a debtcollector, and the debt in question …
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has overturned a lower court’s ruling that granted summary judgment in favor of a debtcollector that was sued for violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act because it was entitled to the Bona Fide Error defense, determining that the lower court erred in assessing the BFE test.
A District Court judge in Ohio has awarded a plaintiff more than $70,000 in damages and attorney fees after a default judgment was entered against a defendant in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case that accused the defendant of not properly identifying itself as a debtcollector in conversations between the two and for … The post Judge (..)
A District Court judge in Utah has certified a FairDebtCollection Practices Act class action case which accused a defendant of pursuing judgments on defaulted debts without registering as a debtcollector in the state. A copy of the ruling in the case of Lawrence v.
When is a communication from a debtcollector not an attempt to collect a debt? If it says so in a letter to an attorney representing a consumer, is that enough?
The second time before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals turned out to be the charm for a debtcollector that was accused of violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act by attempting to collect more than what was owed after a hospital made a billing error.
A District Court judge in Illinois has dismissed a FairDebtCollection Practices Act claim made by a plaintiff — who has the same name as a plaintiff’s attorney — against a debtcollector while denying the defendant’s motion for summary judgment on a Telephone Consumer Protection Act claim, ruling that it isn’t clear (..)
They are difficult to defend because rarely are they suitable for a motion to dismiss and, instead, must go through discovery and then a motion for summary judgment. A debtcollector who is not satisfied with their internal policies and procedures should not be willing to go down this path.) More details here.
APPEALS COURT OVERTURNS FDCPA CASE THAT USED BFE DEFENSE The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has overturned a lower court’s ruling that granted summary judgment in favor of a debtcollector that was sued for violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act because it was entitled to the Bona Fide Error defense, determining that the … The post (..)
The background: The cases, filed in the District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, alleged violations of Section 1692e(8) of the FDCPA, which prohibits debtcollectors from failing to communicate that a disputed debt is disputed. Learn more. And more.
With this uptick, regulatory scrutiny may rise, leading to more complaints and lawsuits under laws like the FDCPA (FairDebtCollection Practices Act) and Regulation F due to errors in handling bankrupt debt. Judge Orelia E. However, this also heightens compliance risks related to bankruptcy accounts. Carrington Mortg.
In a case that was spotlighted by Barron & Newburger, a Magistrate Judge in Ohio has granted partial summary judgment in favor of a plaintiff who sued a debtcollector for allegedly violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act because it did not identify itself as a collector when leaving voicemail messages.
A pro se consumer had managed to get a 3-judge panel of the Court of Appeals to reverse (in a 2-1 decision) lower court rulings finding that PRA had established its standing to sue and its ownership of the debtors account in the underlying collection action, and judgment in its favor on the debt. More details here.
A District Court judge in Tennessee has granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, agreeing that the defendant does not meet the definition of debtcollector under the statute, in large part because the plaintiff’s agreement with the creditor spells out the exact nature of the relationship (..)
In this article we will answer the question: What can debtcollectors do to you? Does Colorado Law Protect Me From DebtCollectors? When collecting a debt from you, collection agencies must adhere to federal and state rules. What is the Federal FairDebtCollection Practices Act (FDCPA)?
JUDGE GRANTS MSJ FOR PLAINTIFF OVER STATUS OF DEBT BECAUSE CREDITOR CANCELED ACCOUNT A District Court judge in New York has granted a plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment after it sued a debtcollector for allegedly violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act by sending two collection letters to the plaintiff, determining that the plaintiff (..)
A District Court judge in New York has granted a plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment after it sued a debtcollector for allegedly violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act by sending two collection letters to the plaintiff, determining that the plaintiff must have been correct when he claimed that he did not owe the … The post (..)
California Appeals Court Reverses Judgment in Debt Buyer Case A California Appeals Court has reversed a lower courts ruling in favor of a debt buyer, determining that consumers do not need to show actual damages to pursue statutory damages under the FairDebt Buying Practices Act (FDBPA). Stay tuned!
The background: The case arose from an attempt to collect a debt owed by the plaintiff, who had defaulted on a loan that was later purchased by the defendant, a debt buyer. In October 2020, MLG filed a collection complaint against the plaintiff in the San Diego Superior Court. The ruling: In this ruling, Judge Anthony J.
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed a District Court’s dismissal of a lawsuit filed under the FairDebtCollection Practices Ac. The plaintiff claimed that a debtcollector violated the FDCPA by improperly serving a summons and complaint to the wrong address, obtaining a default judgment, and garnishing her wages.
It will be interesting to see Defendant proceeds with the litigation and files a motion for summary judgment which will be able to be supported with facts from discovery. More details here. WHAT THIS MEANS, FROM BRIT SUTTELL OF BARRON & NEWBURGER: This is an interesting case that was probably not well suited for a Motion to Dismiss. (The
If you have debt on your credit reports or are getting calls from a collection agency, you might wonder how long a debtor can try to collect these debts—and how long it can affect your credit score. Can a debtcollectorcollect after 10 years? Can a DebtCollectorCollect After 10 Years?
For the second time, a District Court judge in Illinois has dismissed a FairDebtCollection Practices Act class-action lawsuit because the plaintiff lacked standing to sue, this time ruling that the plaintiff could not have paid the settlement amount offered by the debtcollector or successfully changed the order of other payments.
On August 31, 2021, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a summary judgment decision from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, and remanded the action with instructions to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Both of the parties moved for summary judgment. See Wadsworth v.
As the court observed, the percentage of the law firm’s business devoted to collections had little bearing on whether it “regularly” collecteddebts on behalf of another and the lack of record evidence bearing on that point was no grounds for granting the law firm summary judgment. More details here. More details here.
Here, the debt buyer referred an account to a law firm, who filed a collection lawsuit. Here, the debt buyer referred an account to a law firm, who filed a collection lawsuit. It provides that the debtcollector can be liable regardless of intent, negligence, etc (with few exceptions). More details here.
District Court for the Southern District of California, granting summary judgment in favor of a debtcollector in a FairDebtCollections Practices Act (FDCPA) case. Krieger), to collect the debt. 24, 2022) , the Ninth Circuit partially reversed a decision by the U.S.
Judge Grants MTD in FDCPA Class Action Over Language in Letter A District Court judge in New Jersey has granted a defendant’s motion to dismiss a FairDebtCollection Practices Act class-action lawsuit, but not on the merits as the defendant had sought. Read on to hear what the experts have to say this week. More details here.
Getting calls from debtcollectors can be frustrating and even confusing. That’s even truer when someone is contacting you about an old debt you forgot about, thought was long resolved, or didn’t know about in the first place. Can a debtcollectorcollect after 10 years, for example?
Dealing with credit card debt is challenging, let alone facing a debt lawsuit.If If you find yourself being sued by a debtcollector, you may wonder how to get a credit card lawsuit dismissed. Unfortunately, as consumer debt rises, lawsuits are becoming more and more common. An estimated 2.5
Dunn The House Financial Services Committee voted 35-25 on March 21, 2018 to advance H.R. 5082, officially known as the “Practice of Law Technical Clarification Act of 2018,” to the full House of Representatives.
Some of the most important include: Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 93, Section 49: Section 49 of Chapter 93 prohibits unfair, deceptive, or unreasonable debtcollection practices. It sets the standard for ethical collection methods. Massachusetts FairDebtCollection Practices Act (MGL c.93,
Since debtcollectors are on the phone all day long, they know every tactic to get paid. The cost of collection agencies depends on whether you select their Fixed-fee or Contingency-fee service. This could involve filing a lawsuit to seek a judgment for the amount owed.
Finding that the defendant debtcollector was entitled to rely on the information provided by its client about the name of the debtor, a district court judge in Washington state granted summary judgment in favor of Puget Sound Collections, Inc. PSC) in a FairDebtCollections Practices Act (FDCPA) case.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 19,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content