This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
To better understand the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, I’ve broken it down into three discernable parts: 1) Elements of a cause of action under the FDCPA. The FDCPA prohibits debtcollectors from making false or misleading representations and from engaging in various abusive and unfair practices. 3d 1175, 1205 (M.D.
By Anna Claire Turpin The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals recently explored the limitations of Section 1692(f)(6) and held that a property preservation and maintenance company was not a debtcollector for purposes of that section. 1692f(6) by dispossessing her of her personal property when there was no legalright to possession.
The Federal Trade Commission is sending more than $540,000 in refunds to consumers who paid a group of abusive debtcollectors who threatened consumers with lawsuits or arrest if they failed to pay debt that they might not have even owed.
Unlike the FDCPA, which only applies to debtcollectors, the FCCPA applies to all persons or businesses collecting consumer debts. The tenant/debtor will usually allege that the 3-day notice either sought to collect an illegitimate debt or the 3-day notice threatened the existence of a legalright that did not exist.
The rules also establish a fairer process for borrowers to raise a defense to repayment, while preserving the borrowers’ day in court by preventing institutions of higher education (institutions) from forcing students to sign away their legalrights using mandatory arbitration agreements and class-action waivers.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 19,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content