This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Last week, the CFPB issued a Consent Order against a New Jersey based debt-collection agency (Agency) over allegations that the Agency regularly violated the FDCPA and the CFPA in the course of their collection activity.
Quasi in rem: Quasi in rem judgments consider the legalrights of individuals and not necessarily all parties involved. Ultimately, if you don’t pay a debt , the lender or bill collector can file a lawsuit against you to recoup the money. What if the loan company or debtcollector has already started the lawsuit?
The Federal Trade Commission is sending more than $540,000 in refunds to consumers who paid a group of abusive debtcollectors who threatened consumers with lawsuits or arrest if they failed to pay debt that they might not have even owed.
Plaintiff’s counsel is on a state-wide rampage trying to hold debt buyers and debtcollectors liable under an obscure licensing statute. WHAT THIS MEANS, FROM CHUCK DODGE OF HUDSON COOK: This decision is a mixed one for the defendant, a lawfirm. The ruling, delivered by Judge Daphne A.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 19,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content