This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
If you have ever listened to an attorney on one of my webinars talk about the differences between filing a motion to dismiss and a motion for summary judgment, they will tell you that the motion for summary judgment allows them to gather evidence, such as deposing the plaintiff. That step can get a plaintiff to say, for example, that when she claimed receiving mail is inconvenient and that a collection operation shouldn’t send her any more mail, what she meant was that it was inconvenient
New York state legislators introduced the FAIR Business Practices Act in early March 2025, in hopes of providing small businesses more ways to defend themselves from unfair, abusive, and deceptive conduct. Protections that are currently only available to consumers within the state. The Fostering Affordability and Integrity through Reasonable (FAIR) Business Practices Act intends to add a provision to New Yorks General Obligations Law, Section 349, to offer small business owners and not-for-profi
A healthcare revenue cycle management company recently notified the Massachusetts Attorney General about a data breach. The breach, which occurred between March 18 and March 24, 2024, involved an unauthorized party accessing files stored on a third-party hosting service and impacted a handful of healthcare providers. The Details: An investigation found that the compromised files contained sensitive information, including patients’ names, Social Security numbers, and financial account data.
Getting to Know Stephanie Strickler of Messer Strickler Burnette Judge Grants MSJ for Defendant in FDCPA Case Over Convenient Mode of Communication California Pushes to Fill Gap Being Left by CFPB RCM Company Suffers Data Breach WORTH NOTING:As Spring blooms around the country, here are some great gift ideas for the gardeners in your life … Understanding the physics of “torpedo” baseball bats … Morgan Wallen is capitalizing on his early exit from “Saturday Night Liv
AI is reshaping industries, yet finance remains one of the slowest adopters. Concerns over compliance, legacy systems, and data silos have made finance teams hesitant to embrace AI-driven transformation. But delaying adoption isn’t just about efficiency—it’s about staying competitive in a rapidly evolving landscape. How can finance leaders overcome these challenges and start leveraging AI effectively?
I am thrilled to announce that the Getting to Know series will be sponsored by TEC Services Group in 2024. TEC Services Group is the leading technology and professional services firm in the credit collections industry offering both leading industry solutions along with unrivaled, unbiased, and experienced support. TEC is now extending its services by offering proven, industry-leading technology solutions alongside of our Professional Services to help Clients feel confident in their technology de
The California legislature is pushing a bill that would enhance the powers of the state’s top financial to oversee businesses traditionally governed by the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. As the federal government scales back its consumer protection efforts, the bill aims to fill the void left by the CFPB’s reduced oversight, especially in light of the changes initiated under the Trump administration.
The California legislature is pushing a bill that would enhance the powers of the state’s top financial to oversee businesses traditionally governed by the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. As the federal government scales back its consumer protection efforts, the bill aims to fill the void left by the CFPB’s reduced oversight, especially in light of the changes initiated under the Trump administration.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 19,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
130 
Let's personalize your content