This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
On June 4, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court decided the case of Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP v. Appling , No. 16-1215, which dealt with the dischargeability of debt in bankruptcy proceedings. The Court held that a statement about a single asset can be a “statement respecting the debtor’s financial condition” under section 523(a)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code.
Does your current collection partner provide you, at your fingertips, online reporting that provides you access to every piece of information that you need to manage and review their recovery performance, and track how they are working your company’s placements? 1. Are you able to review recovery analytics in a split second? 2. Can you look at individual file performance, review legible collector notes with the click of a mouse?
Picture this: an account becomes overdue and your in-house attorney files suit against the debtor. A judgment is awarded in your favor, but the debt still isn’t paid. You call Point Law and say “we have a judgment, so what do we do now? What’s next?” We encounter this same situation over and over again. People automatically assume that suing and winning means getting paid.
In a recent opinion, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (the “Court”) ruled that penalties assessed by the state of Michigan against two debtors, stemming from fraud associated with the wrongful receipt of Michigan unemployment benefits, are non-dischargeable in Chapter 13 bankruptcy pursuant to Bankruptcy Code § 523(a)(2). 1 Read More › Tags: 6th Circuit Court of Appeals , Chapter 13.
AI is reshaping industries, yet finance remains one of the slowest adopters. Concerns over compliance, legacy systems, and data silos have made finance teams hesitant to embrace AI-driven transformation. But delaying adoption isn’t just about efficiency—it’s about staying competitive in a rapidly evolving landscape. How can finance leaders overcome these challenges and start leveraging AI effectively?
Picture this: an account becomes overdue and your in-house attorney files suit against the debtor. A judgment is awarded in your favor, but the debt still isn’t paid. You call Turbo Debt Recovery and say “we have a judgment, so what do we do now? What’s next?”. We encounter this same situation over and over again. People automatically assume that suing and winning means getting paid.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 19,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content