This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
A District Court judge in Virginia has dismissed the majority of claims against several defendants in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act class-action lawsuit, but allowed one key claim against a collection agency to proceed.
A District Court judge in Oklahoma has dismissed the class-action component of a FairDebtCollection Practices Act lawsuit, while also dismissing some of the claims, after the defendant was accused of not sending a collection lawsuit summons to the plaintiff’s correct address, which it allegedly had.
A District Court judge there has granted a defendant’s motion to dismiss a FairDebtCollection Practices Act lawsuit on the grounds that the plaintiff lacked standing because he had the claim assigned to him by the individual who actually owed the debt in question.
A District Court judge in Oklahoma has dismissed yet another “inconvenient” time or place case under the FairDebtCollection Practices Act in which a plaintiff mails a letter to the defendant requesting or demanding that all future contact between the parties be conducted via email, ruling that both the FDCPA and Regulation F gave the (..)
This appears on its face to be a FairDebtCollection Practices Act class-action lawsuit that should serve as a reminder that when making calls to consumers, either double check the time zones or only make calls when all time zones are inside the appropriate window to be contacted.
In a case that was defended by the team at Barron & Newburger, the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has reversed a lower court’s ruling in favor of a plaintiff in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act (FDCPA) case over the timing of when the defendant notified credit reporting agencies that the debt […]
The Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has upheld a ruling in favor of a defendant that was sued for violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act, deciding that a default judgment obtained in state court is “conclusive” from the perspective of establishing the facts of a case.
Not necessarily, ruled a District Court judge in Pennsylvania, who granted the operation’s motion for summary judgment after it was sued for allegedly violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act. The background: The defendant filed a lawsuit against the plaintiff in 2018 over an alleged credit card debt.
A District Court judge in Illinois has granted a defendant’s motion to dismiss a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruling the plaintiff lacked standing after alleging violations related to a disputed debt originating from identity theft.
A District Court judge in Michigan has denied a defendant’s motion to dismiss and stayed a case in which the defendant is accused of violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act and state law in Michigan while a state court determines whether or not the underlying debt is for personal or business reasons.
It’s not often that both sides in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act lawsuit get their motions granted at the same time, but a District Court judge in New Jersey pulled off the feat, ultimately remanding the case back to state court after the defendant was accused of attempting to collect on a debt without being properly licensed to collect (..)
A California Appeals Court has reversed a lower court’s ruling in favor of a collection law firm and debtcollection operation that were sued for violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act (FDCPA), ruling that the public interest exception to the state’s anti-SLAPP law applies to the case.
A District Court judge in California has granted a defendant’s motion to dismiss after it was accused of violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act and the Rosenthal FairDebtCollection Practices Act by attempting to collect on a debt that had been discharged in bankruptcy.
A District Court judge in Maryland has granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case that centers over the language used by the plaintiff and whether it constituted a dispute of the debt or not.
A District Court judge in Florida has granted a plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruling that a collection law firm used an invalid garnishment order to collect on the subject debt. The decision, issued by Judge William F.
The big picture: The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Indian Health Service issued new guidance last week emphasizing the responsibilities of medical providers, billers, and debt collectors under the Indian Health Care Improvement Act (IHCIA), the FairDebtCollection Practices Act, and the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
A state Appeals Court in Wisconsin has affirmed the certification of a class in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, agreeing with the lower court that the plaintiff’s claims were not mooted by an offer of individual relief made by the defendant.
A District Court judge granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruling that the plaintiff’s claims were barred because they should have been addressed in an earlier case instead of a separate lawsuit being filed.
A District Court judge in Washington has denied a defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act class-action case over alleged “junk” fees, ruling that the plaintiffs adequately pleaded plausible claims under the FDCPA and related state consumer protection laws.
The Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has overturned a lower court’s ruling in favor of the defendant in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruling that the defendants lack of knowledge about a prior dispute did not absolve it of its obligations under the FDCPA.
A District Court Judge in Washington has granted a motion to dismiss filed by all the defendants in a Fair Credit Reporting Act and FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruling that the plaintiff failed to adequately allege that the defendants actions were impermissible under the law.
A Magistrate Court judge in Wisconsin has denied a plaintiff’s motion to alter a judgment which ruled he did not have standing to pursue claims the defendant violated the FairDebtCollection Practices Act, finding that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a concrete injury that could be linked to the defendant’s alleged misconduct.
A California Appeals Court has overturned a lower court’s dismissal of a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruling that even a mistaken attempt to collect a debt from the wrong person can be subject to liability.
traffic rules, weather conditions), in collections, these models would need to function within legal and compliance guidelines. This means interpreting consumer requests while respecting regulations like the FairDebtCollection Practices Act (FDCPA) and other consumer protection laws.
A District Court judge in Michigan has granted a defendant’s motion to dismiss a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case on the grounds that not removing a dispute notification on the plaintiff’s credit report is not a false or misleading statement in connection with the collection of a debt.
The defendant in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case finds itself lucky after a Magistrate Court judge in California ruled that inadvertently copying and pasting the request for an admission as its response does not satisfy the numerosity requirement of certifying a class action and denied the plaintiff’s motion for certification.
Today’s webinar just happens to be on the topic of legal collections (register here) so it’s entirely timely to write about a court ruling involving a judgment.
A District Court judge in Mississippi has approved a settlement in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act class action that will see the defendant pay $14,000 to the plaintiffs and their attorneys.
A California Appeals Court has affirmed the denial of an anti-SLAPP motion filed by a defendant being sued for violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act and the Rosenthal FairDebtCollection Practices Act for allegedly making false representations in an underlying collection lawsuit.
Key details: The proposed bill would bring several changes to current debtcollection practices, including: Why it matters: Consumer advocacy groups have long pushed for updates to the 1978 FairDebtCollection Practices Act, which many argue has not kept pace with evolving communication methods and the rise in medical debt.
A District Court judge in Florida has been forced to rule on competing motions for attorney’s fees in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case in which both sides are claiming victory, ruling partially in favor of both the plaintiff and the defendant.
A plaintiff has filed a lawsuit against a collection operation, accusing it of violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act by failing to properly validate a debt and contacting him at inconvenient times, and is seeking the discharge of the debt was well as $30,000 in actual and statutory damages.
A District Court judge in Virginia has issued a consent decree in which a law firm representing a plaintiff in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case will pay both the plaintiff and the defendant a total of $50,000 and take corrective action after it was accused of filing one lawsuit and settling another in the plaintiff’s name without her (..)
A District Court Judge in Ohio has granted a defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings — albeit on a technicality — in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act (FDCPA) case that accused the defendant of sending a text message attempting to collect on a debt after the plaintiff had responded to an earlier text message declining (..)
A Magistrate Court judge in Utah has partially granted a plaintiff’s motion to compel several collection operations to comply with subpoenas in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case in which the defendants are attempting to argue they do not meet the statute’s definition of a debt collector.
A Magistrate Court judge in North Carolina has granted a plaintiff’s motion compelling the defendant in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case to provide unredacted copies of its compliance and procedure manuals and details of communications between the defendant and its clients, but did deny the plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s (..)
A District Court judge in New York has denied a defendant’s motion to dismiss a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case over the amount the plaintiff owed, ruling that the plaintiff had sufficiently alleged that the defendants’ actions caused concrete harm.
A bill has been introduced in the House of Representatives to amend the FairDebtCollection Practices Act in order to include additional information when sending the validation notice while also expanding the requirements before filing collection lawsuits. What It Is: H.R.
The background: The plaintiff allegedly signed a housing agreement for an apartment while attending university. The plaintiff allegedly failed to make the required prepayment and was also unable to secure a suitable guarantor.
million by falsely representing debts and threatening extreme consequences, including lawsuits, asset seizures, and even arrest. and its sole owner Kenneth Redon III, are accused of violating multiple federal laws, including the FTC Act, the FairDebtCollection Practices Act, and Regulation F.
A District Court judge in Arizona has granted a defendant’s motion to dismiss a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruling that the plaintiff failed to sufficiently establish the defendant’s status as a “debt collector” under the statute and did not plead adequate facts to support the alleged violations.
In a ruling that — to this non-lawyer appears to take the issue of standing and turn it on its head — the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has reversed a lower court’s dismissal of a FairDebtCollection Practices Act suit, ruling that the receipt of a letter after being informed that the individual was represented by an attorney (..)
A District Court judge in Hawaii has granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment and partially granted its motion for costs and fees in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case dealing with a dispute over the collection of maintenance and cable fees for an investment property and escalating attorney’s fees that were charged after (..)
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 19,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content