This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Today’s webinar just happens to be on the topic of legal collections (register here) so it’s entirely timely to write about a court ruling involving a judgment. The background: The plaintiff alleged that the defendant violated the FDCPA by failing to notify him that the debt in question was time-barred.
The Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has upheld a ruling in favor of a defendant that was sued for violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act, deciding that a default judgment obtained in state court is “conclusive” from the perspective of establishing the facts of a case.
A collection operation is facing a FairDebtCollection Practices Act class action lawsuit for not adjusting the post-judgment interest rate after the state of Kentucky changed the maximum rate that could be charged seven years ago, according to a copy of the complaint.
A collection attorney in New York is facing a class-action lawsuit for allegedly violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act and state law when attempting to collect on judgments owed to a bankrupt for-profit university.
Better late than never, a federal judge in Nevada has ruled, denying a motion for default judgment against a defendant in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case because the defendant has now starting to defend itself “in earnest.” ” A copy of the ruling in the case of Hankerson v.
A District Court judge in Indiana has granted a motion to vacate a default judgment that was entered against a defendant in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruling that the plaintiff never properly served the defendant with the summons and complaint, after the defendant removed the case to federal court.
The Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has vacated a judgment in favor of a plaintiff who alleged a debt buyer violated the FairDebtCollection Practices Act because the collection agency it used to collect on an unpaid debt contacted the plaintiff even though she was represented by an attorney — a fact … The post Appeals Court Vacates (..)
A District Court judge in Nevada has dismissed – with prejudice – a plaintiff’s class-action complaint that a defendant violated the FairDebtCollection Practices Act by filing renewals for a judgment on an untimely basis, ruling that the defendant renewed the judgments within the window set forth by state law.
A District Court judge in North Carolina has granted a defendant’s motion for relief from judgment on the grounds that a default judgment obtained by the plaintiff in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case is void due to lack of service of process. A copy of the ruling in the case of Becvar v.
A District Court judge in Pennsylvania has certified a class action in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act lawsuit that accused a defendant of violating the statute by mentioning in a letter that a judgment may be awarded before the expiration of a settlement offer that was being made, even though a collection lawsuit had … The post Judge Certifies (..)
The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has affirmed a lower court’s ruling denying a debt collector’s motion for relief from a judgment because of “gross negligence” by its attorney for failing to respond to a motion for summary judgment filed by the plaintiff in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act lawsuit that ultimately (..)
Is it possible for an individual to sue a debt collector for violating the Fair Credit Reporting Act and FairDebtCollection Practices Act for allegedly attempting to collect a debt that the individual believes he did not owe, when the individual took no action against the original creditor for placing the allegedly illegitimate debt … The post (..)
A District Court judge has granted a defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings after it was sued by a brother and sister for allegedly violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act by discussing the sister’s debt with the brother, but only after the brother used the sister’s personal information — the last four digits (..)
In a case that was defended by Rick Perr and Monica Littman of Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck, a District Court judge in New York has granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a class-action FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruling the plaintiff lacked standing to sue because he did not suffer a concrete … The post Judge (..)
In a case that was defended by the team at Malone Frost Martin, a District Court judge has granted a defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings in a FairDebtCollection Practices class action after alleging that the amount owed listed in a collection letter was lower than it should have been and that … The post Judge Grants Motion (..)
The background: The plaintiff, a former tenant, filed the lawsuit against after receiving a letter from the defendant offering to settle her outstanding rent debt for roughly half the amount owed.
A District Court judge in Ohio has granted a defendant’s motion to vacate an entry of default that was filed against it in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruling that the defendant’s failure to respond to the plaintiff’s complaint did not constitute culpable conduct and that the case should be decided on its merits.
A District Court judge in Kentucky has partially granted and partially denied a collection attorney’s motion to dismiss a FairDebtCollection Practices Act lawsuit, ruling that the attorney’s motion for default judgment in an underlying collection case was “improper” because the plaintiff had filed a response to the suit.
JUDGE GRANTS MTD IN FDCPA CASE OVER LACK OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE ON MVN We were so close to what I think would have been our first ruling on the safe harbor of using the Model Validation Notice, but a District Court judge in Utah ruled a plaintiff lacked standing to pursue his FairDebtCollection … The post Daily Digest – December 28.
The post Judge Grants Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment in FDCPA, FCRA Case Over Complaint Sent to Empty Office appeared first on AccountsRecovery.net.
A District Court judge in Maryland has granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case that centers over the language used by the plaintiff and whether it constituted a dispute of the debt or not. I decline to pay this debt.”
Receiving one phone call and six messages from a collector after notifying it that she was being represented by an attorney is not enough to warrant the $25,000 in emotional distress being sought by the plaintiff in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruled a Magistrate Judge, saying that the amount was “pulled out … The post Judge (..)
A District Court judge in Florida has granted a plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruling that a collection law firm used an invalid garnishment order to collect on the subject debt. The decision, issued by Judge William F.
Is the choice made by a collection operation to dismiss a collection lawsuit against a consumer a decision in the consumer’s favor? The background: The defendant filed a lawsuit against the plaintiff in 2018 over an alleged credit card debt.
A District Court judge in California has granted a defendant’s motion to dismiss after it was accused of violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act and the Rosenthal FairDebtCollection Practices Act by attempting to collect on a debt that had been discharged in bankruptcy.
A District Court judge granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruling that the plaintiff’s claims were barred because they should have been addressed in an earlier case instead of a separate lawsuit being filed.
A District Court judge in Washington has denied a defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act class-action case over alleged “junk” fees, ruling that the plaintiffs adequately pleaded plausible claims under the FDCPA and related state consumer protection laws.
Smith of the District Court for the District of Hawaii granted the defendants motion for summary judgment, ruling that the plaintiffs had not provided sufficient evidence to support their FDCPA or IIED claims. Despite the plaintiffs attempts to resolve the situation, including contacting the HOA for payment details, the fees went unpaid.
A Magistrate Court judge in Wisconsin has denied a plaintiff’s motion to alter a judgment which ruled he did not have standing to pursue claims the defendant violated the FairDebtCollection Practices Act, finding that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a concrete injury that could be linked to the defendant’s alleged misconduct.
A District Court judge in Michigan has denied a defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruling that the defendants attempt to impose a 5% interest rate on the debt without clear contractual or legal authorization may constitute a violation of the FDCPA.
After reaching an agreement, a judgment of dismissal with prejudice was filed on December 30, 2022. The plaintiff had originally entered into litigation with the defendant over two accounts.
The background: The case stems from a debt incurred by the plaintiff following medical care at a hospital. However, the Ninth Circuit vacated the summary judgment that had been granted in favor of the collection agency regarding the alleged FDCPA violations. Learn more.
A District Court Judge in Ohio has granted a defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings — albeit on a technicality — in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act (FDCPA) case that accused the defendant of sending a text message attempting to collect on a debt after the plaintiff had responded to an earlier text message declining (..)
In a case that was defended by the team at Martin Golden Lyons Wats Morgan, a District Court Judge in Colorado has granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act lawsuit, ruling that the debt collector did not violate the statutes debt verification requirements.
A District Court judge in Nevada has granted partial summary judgment to both the plaintiff and the defendant in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruling that while the defendant’s actions in obtaining a default judgment were improper, the subsequent attempts to collect the debt were permissible under the law.
A District Court judge in New York has essentially split the difference in awarding attorney’s fees to the plaintiff in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case because both sides could not come to an agreement on their own after the plaintiff accepted an offer of judgment.
A California Appeals Court has overturned a summary judgment ruling in favor of a collector that was sued for violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act and the Rosenthal FairDebtCollection Practices Act by stapling a note to a court-provided summons, … The post Calif.
A District Court judge in New York has granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment on six of the seven counts in a lawsuit claiming a letter it sent to the plaintiff violated several sections of the FairDebtCollection Practices Act, but denied summary judgment motions from both sides on the remaining count that … The post Judge (..)
The Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed one summary judgment ruling in favor of a defendant that was sued for violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act yesterday while overturning a separate summary judgment ruling, concluding that one defendant was entitled to the FDCPA’s bona fide error defense while the other should not (..)
A few months after filing the suit, the plaintiff accepted the defendant’s offer of judgment in the amount of $2,001 for damages plus attorney’s fees and costs. ” The background: The plaintiff initially filed the lawsuit, accusing the defendant of violating both the FDCPA and the Rosenthal FDCPA. .” in costs.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 19,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content