This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has upheld a summary judgment ruling in favor of a lawfirm that was accused of violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act by suing an individual who was allegedly responsible for a medical debt incurred by his wife, before they divorced.
A class-action lawsuit has been filed in New Jersey by a plaintiff who claims that a debt buyer allegedly violated the FairDebtCollection Practices Act because it did not have the proper license to authorize a collectionlawfirm to try and collect on a judgment in that state and that a letter sent … The post FDCPA Class Action Filed Against (..)
A District Court judge in Florida has granted a plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruling that a collectionlawfirm used an invalid garnishment order to collect on the subject debt. The decision, issued by Judge William F.
Appeals Court Affirms Ruling Over Default Judgment The Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has upheld a ruling in favor of a defendant that was sued for violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act, deciding that a default judgment obtained in state court is conclusive from the perspective of establishing the facts of a case.
A District Court judge in Maryland has granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case that centers over the language used by the plaintiff and whether it constituted a dispute of the debt or not. I decline to pay this debt.”
A District Court judge in Minnesota has awarded 25% of the attorney’s fees sought by the plaintiff in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruling the plaintiff’s request unreasonable for a number of reasons. The background: The case stemmed from attempts to collect on a 2007 mortgage loan.
Over time, they neglected to pay the maintenance and cable fees for the property, and the homeowners association hired the defendant, a collectionlawfirm, to collect the outstanding fees. Despite the plaintiffs attempts to resolve the situation, including contacting the HOA for payment details, the fees went unpaid.
The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has partially affirmed and partially reversed a lower court’s ruling in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, determining that the District Court judge should not have granted summary judgment for a collectionlawfirm that “expressly” informed an individual in a collection letter that (..)
The background: The case arose from an attempt to collect a debt owed by the plaintiff, who had defaulted on a loan that was later purchased by the defendant, a debt buyer. The debt buyer referred the plaintiff’s account to a collectionlawfirm to pursue legal action.
BANK ACCUSED IN FDCPA CLASS ACTION OF USING STRAW LAWFIRM TO COLLECT ON DEBT A patsy. A class action lawsuit is accusing a bank of using a lawfirm as a front to collect on its own debts, allegedly violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act by sending … The post Daily Digest – May 5.
Merchant of the District Court for the Eastern District of New York issued the ruling, determining that the plaintiff failed to establish sufficient connections between the lawfirm and the state of New York to justify her authority over the defendant. Read on to hear what the experts have to say this week. More details here.
A District Court judge in Michigan has certifies a class in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case accusing a collectionlawfirm of charging excessive post-judgment interest on dozens of debtcollection lawsuits across the state. In three of the cases, […]
When obtaining a judgment in a debtcollection action and, thereafter, seeking to enforce that judgment, debt collectors must be aware of the EIPA and proceed accordingly. More details here. Pro se complaints should always be evaluated for early motion practice.
A District Court judge in Wisconsin has denied a defendant’s motion for summary judgment after it was sued for allegedly violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act because it attempted … The post Judge Denies Defendant’s MSJ in FDCPA Case Seeking to Collect on Canceled Debt appeared first on AccountsRecovery.net.
A District Court judge in Pennsylvania has denied a defendant’s motion to dismiss a FairDebtCollection Practices Act class action lawsuit, ruling the plaintiff plausibly alleged violations of the statute after the defendant — a collectionlawfirm — allegedly edited an account statement to include additional fees.
A District Court judge in Arizona has granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruling that it is entitled to the statute’s bona fide error defense after garnishing a bank account where Social Security payments were deposited to satisfy a judgment.
A District Court judge in Arizona has granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruling that it is entitled to the statute’s bona fide error defense after garnishing a bank account where Social Security payments were deposited to satisfy a judgment.
In this case, a credit-reporting agency defending an FCRA case issued subpoenas to a consumer lawfirm to determine whether that firm was acting as a credit-repair organization and to learn about its process for creating and sending dispute letters on behalf of consumers. More details here.
A District Court judge in Minnesota has denied a defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act class-action lawsuit, ruling that there were genuine issues of material fact in dispute regarding whether the defendant lawfirm qualifies as a debt collector under the FDCPA and whether its actions violated the statute. (..)
Capouano, Beckman, Russell & Burnett LLC , the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit recently affirmed defendant lawfirm Capouano, Beckman, Russell & Burnett LLC’s (Firm) motion for summary judgment involving an alleged violation of the FairDebtCollection Practices Act (FDCPA).
Judge Dismisses Remaining FDCPA Claim in BK Case A District Court judge in Illinois has dismissed the remaining claim in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case against a defendant, citing a lack of subject matter jurisdiction because the plaintiff lacked standing to sue. Read on to hear what the experts have to say this week.
That said, let me walk you through all the elements of this particular email that tip it off as a scam: From: Sherrill Green <SherrillGreen@outlook.com> Wait, the prestigious “Webster LawFirm” doesn’t have it’s own domain and you’re using a generic outlook.com account? Attorney at Law?
5082, officially known as the “Practice of Law Technical Clarification Act of 2018,” to the full House of Representatives. Dunn The House Financial Services Committee voted 35-25 on March 21, 2018 to advance H.R.
As the court observed, the percentage of the lawfirm’s business devoted to collections had little bearing on whether it “regularly” collecteddebts on behalf of another and the lack of record evidence bearing on that point was no grounds for granting the lawfirm summary judgment.
When a debtor owes a creditor money and the creditor is seeking assistance collecting the amount owed, the creditor can either use a collectionlawfirm or a collection agency. Lawfirms and collection agencies serve the same purpose initially.
On February 13, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of an Eastern District of New York court and found that the defendant lawfirm, Mandarich Law Group, LLC (Mandarich), had conducted a meaningful attorney review of the plaintiff debtor’s account prior to mailing her a debtcollection letter on the firm’s letterhead.
Training staff to effectively and respectfully communicate with clients and customers can help maintain positive relationships, even during collection efforts. Partnering with a lawfirm that has a reputation for ethical debtcollection can help to ensure that collection efforts are both effective and compliant with the law.
District Court for the Southern District of California, granting summary judgment in favor of a debt collector in a FairDebtCollections Practices Act (FDCPA) case. In doing so, it held that a collection letter, which indicated that the debtor could only dispute the underlying debt in writing, violated the FDCPA.
Carpenter, Hazelwood, Delgado & Boren PLC , the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the district court’s entry of summary judgment for the appellees-defendants in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act (FDCPA) case. In Glawe v.
In a recent decision out of the Middle District of Tennessee, a medical provider’s third-party billing servicer did not qualify as a debt collector under the FairDebtCollections Practices Act (“FDCPA”) because the debt was not in default when it was placed with the extended billing office.
291 (1995), lawyers have known that if they seek to collect consumer debts for clients – even when doing so through litigation – they might qualify as a "debt collector" under the FairDebtCollection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. Click here for more information on what constitutes a "debt" under the FDCPA.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued a summary order affirming a district court’s holding that an emailed response to the plaintiff’s email did not constitute an “initial communication” under the FairDebtCollections Practices Act (FDCPA). In Worley v. Simon, Meyrowitz & Meyrowitz, P.C. ,
The Rodenburg LawFirm (Rodenburg), whose primary business is debtcollection, held a Commercial Umbrella Liability Policy with The Cincinnati Insurance Company (Cincinnati Insurance) that obligated Cincinnati Insurance to indemnify Rodenburg for liability to third parties for certain defined injuries. Rodenburg appealed.
The creditor referred the account to a lawfirm, which served the consumer with a collection suit and obtained a default judgment for the balance. The lawfirm sent four post-judgmentcollection letters, demanding the $4,225.74 The consumer never made a payment on the judgment.
On January 11, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) announced it reached a settlement with lawfirm Forster & Garbus, LLP in its lawsuit over alleged illegal debtcollection practices. In doing so, the CFPB alleged (similar to its previous actions involving the lawfirms Frederick J.
District Court for the District of New Jersey denied the defendant’s summary judgment motion holding instead that a bank levy against the plaintiff served as a basis for standing to assert a claim under the FairDebtCollections Practices Act (FDCPA). In Tomaine v. and obtaining a $278.75
The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently affirmed a district court’s dismissal of a suit holding that the plaintiff had not suffered a concrete injury, and therefore, lacked standing to assert a claim under the FairDebtCollections Practices Act (FDCPA). Kohn LawFirm, S.C. In Choice v.
The Eleventh Circuit recently joined the First and Eighth Circuits in concluding that the FDCPA’s venue provision does not apply to post-judgment garnishment proceedings. Post judgment, the lawfirm filed a garnishment proceeding against the consumer’s bank seeking to collect on the judgment. 1692i(a)(2).
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently reversed an award of summary judgment in favor of a defendant debt collector against claims that it violated the federal FairDebtCollection Practices Act (FDCPA) by attempting to collect a debt that was discharged in bankruptcy and no longer owed.
Other complaints are linked to the lack of or failure to comply with licensing, the theft of monies collected for the benefit of creditors by the collection vendor, and more. New York DebtCollectionLaws. As of today, New York does not require licensing for collection agencies or collectionlawfirms.
Mario Barboza was a resident of Collin County, Texas when Pharia, LLC, successor in interest to defendant Pallida LLC, filed a collections action in 2010 in Denton County, Texas to recover the balance due on Barboza’s credit card. In early 2011, a default judgment was obtained against Barboza.
Mario Barboza was a resident of Collin County, Texas when Pharia, LLC, successor in interest to defendant Pallida LLC, filed a collections action in 2010 in Denton County, Texas to recover the balance due on Barboza’s credit card. In early 2011, a default judgment was obtained against Barboza.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 19,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content