This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The case, which was filed in the Eastern District of Virginia, involved the lawfirm Guards Law. The controversy began when Guards Law allegedly filed a lawsuit and later settled another without the plaintiff’s consent or knowledge.
A District Court judge in Oklahoma has dismissed the class-action component of a FairDebtCollection Practices Act lawsuit, while also dismissing some of the claims, after the defendant was accused of not sending a collection lawsuit summons to the plaintiff’s correct address, which it allegedly had.
The Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has upheld a summary judgment ruling in favor of a lawfirm that was accused of violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act by suing an individual who was allegedly responsible for a medical debt incurred by his wife, before they divorced.
A hospital and the collectionlawfirm it uses have removed a class-action lawsuit filed against them to federal court in New Jersey, after they were accused of violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act by including the plaintiff’s health insurance policy number on documents in (..)
A class-action lawsuit has been filed in New Jersey by a plaintiff who claims that a debt buyer allegedly violated the FairDebtCollection Practices Act because it did not have the proper license to authorize a collectionlawfirm to try and collect on a judgment in that state and that a letter sent … The post FDCPA Class Action Filed Against (..)
A California Appeals Court has reversed a lower court’s ruling in favor of a collectionlawfirm and debtcollection operation that were sued for violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act (FDCPA), ruling that the public interest exception to the state’s anti-SLAPP law applies to the case.
A District Court judge in Florida has granted a plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruling that a collectionlawfirm used an invalid garnishment order to collect on the subject debt. The decision, issued by Judge William F.
A District Court judge in Minnesota has awarded 25% of the attorney’s fees sought by the plaintiff in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruling the plaintiff’s request unreasonable for a number of reasons. The background: The case stemmed from attempts to collect on a 2007 mortgage loan.
The background: The case arose from an attempt to collect a debt owed by the plaintiff, who had defaulted on a loan that was later purchased by the defendant, a debt buyer. The debt buyer referred the plaintiff’s account to a collectionlawfirm to pursue legal action.
A District Court judge in Maryland has granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case that centers over the language used by the plaintiff and whether it constituted a dispute of the debt or not.
The background: The defendant purchased the debt in question and hired a lawfirm to collect on it. The lawfirm filed a collection lawsuit in state court. After receiving the summons and complaint, the consumer sent a formal demand for arbitration to both the debt buyer and the lawfirm.
The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has partially affirmed and partially reversed a lower court’s ruling in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, determining that the District Court judge should not have granted summary judgment for a collectionlawfirm that “expressly” informed an individual in a collection letter that (..)
The Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has overturned a lower court’s ruling in favor of a plaintiff, determining that he lacked standing to pursue a claim in federal court after suing a collectionlawfirm for allegedly violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act in relation to communicating with the plaintiff rather than … The (..)
Over time, they neglected to pay the maintenance and cable fees for the property, and the homeowners association hired the defendant, a collectionlawfirm, to collect the outstanding fees. Despite the plaintiffs attempts to resolve the situation, including contacting the HOA for payment details, the fees went unpaid.
An interesting FairDebtCollection Practices Act case out of Minnesota involving a creditor who mis-spelled a customer’s first and last name incorrectly when placing the account with a lawfirm for collection, a customer who changed her name before filing for bankruptcy protection, and a lawfirm that may or may not do enough … The post (..)
LawFirm Facing Class Action; DFPI Announces Enforcement Actions first appeared on AccountsRecovery.net. LawFirm Facing Class Action; DFPI Announces Enforcement Actions appeared first on AccountsRecovery.net. The post Daily Digest – January 31.
COLLECTIONFIRM ACCUSED OF SENDING MVN TO REPRESENTED INDIVIDUAL Sending an individual a Model Validation Notice has led to a lawfirm facing a FairDebtCollection Practices Act lawsuit, because the lawfirm allegedly knew the individual was being represented by an attorney, according to a complaint filed in the District Court for the … The (..)
A District Court judge in Maryland has granted a motion to dismiss claims that a creditor and a collectionlawfirm violated the FairDebtCollection Practices Act and state consumer protection laws, ruling that the plaintiffs allegations failed to plausibly demonstrate any unlawful conduct.
The background: The plaintiff incurred two separate debts with a credit card issuer, which were later purchased by the defendant, a debt buyer. The defendant then hired two collectionlawfirms to recover the balances through litigation. The ruling: Judge Laura M.
Merchant of the District Court for the Eastern District of New York issued the ruling, determining that the plaintiff failed to establish sufficient connections between the lawfirm and the state of New York to justify her authority over the defendant. Read on to hear what the experts have to say this week. More details here.
A District Court judge in Florida went to great lengths to spell out exactly why a plaintiff lacked standing to sue in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case in which she alleged a collectionlawfirm did not engage in meaningful attorney involvement before sending a validation notice on an unpaid debt.
A District Court judge in Kentucky has granted a defendant’s motion to dismiss and denied a plaintiff’s request for leave to file an amended complaint after filing a FairDebtCollection Practices Act lawsuit against a collectionlawfirm for allegedly overshadowing the validation notice by mentioning in a collection letter that a lawsuit (..)
A District Court judge in New Jersey has denied a defendant’s motion to dismiss and a motion for sanctions against the plaintiff in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case that is accusing a lawfirm of improperly adding a collection fee in an itemization table included in a summons that was attempting to recover … The post Judge Denies (..)
The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld the dismissal of a pair of lawsuits filed against a collectionlawfirm that accused it of violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act because it included “disbursements” in a statement of claim document when collection lawsuits were filed against the plaintiffs, and because the debt buyer (..)
In a case that was defended by Lawrence Bartel and Andrew Schwartz from Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed the dismissal of a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case in which the wife of a deceased individual sued after she was sent collection letters by a lawfirm seeking … The post Appeals Court Upholds (..)
A District Court judge in California has denied a defendant’s motion to compel arbitration in a FairDebtCollection Practices Act case, ruling that the collectionlawfirm’s actions were independent of the original creditor, and thus not subject to the original agreement’s arbitration clause.
The Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has affirmed a lower court’s ruling in favor of a plaintiff who accused a collectionlawfirm of violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act by obtaining a writ of garnishment in the wrong jurisdiction. A copy of the ruling in the case of Thompson v.
APPEALS COURT UPHOLDS RULING FOR PLAINTIFF IN FDCPA CASE OVER GARNISHMENT JURISDICTION The Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has affirmed a lower court’s ruling in favor of a plaintiff who accused a collectionlawfirm of violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act by obtaining a writ of garnishment in the wrong jurisdiction.
JUDGE GRANTS MSJ FOR DEFENDANT IN FDCPA CASE OVER MIS-IDENTIFIED CONSUMER An interesting FairDebtCollection Practices Act case out of Minnesota involving a creditor who mis-spelled a customer’s first and last name incorrectly when placing the account with a lawfirm for collection, a customer who changed her name before filing for bankruptcy protection, (..)
In a case that was defended by The Echols LawFirm, with local counsel provided by Charles McHale of Golden Scaz Gagain, a District Court judge in Florida has granted a defendant’s motion to dismiss after it was sued for violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act because the plaintiff claimed to have been misled … The post Judge Grants (..)
The Court of Appeals for the state of California has upheld a lower court’s ruling granting an anti-SLAPP motion against a plaintiff that accused a collectionlawfirm of violating the Rosenthal FairDebtCollection Practices Act in a case that the Appeals Court sought to answer whether a plaintiff must show materiality when alleging … (..)
The California State Court of Appeals has partially overturned a lower court’s denial of a lawsuit claiming a collectionlawfirm violated the FairDebtCollection Practices Act and the Telephone Consumer Protection Act in which the defendant attempted to use an anti-SLAPP motion to have the case dismissed.
First, they allegedly misrepresented themselves as attorneys or members of a lawfirm. Second, the FTC claims they violated the FairDebtCollection Practices Act by failing to disclose that they were acting as debt collectors and by making threats arrest, property liens, and wage garnishment that they could not legally enforce.
CLASS ACTION ACCUSES COLLECTOR OF USING INACCURATE NAME OF ORIGINAL CREDITOR A class-action complaint has been filed in federal court in Utah against a collectionlawfirm for allegedly violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act with its Model Validation Notice, which was not dated, but also because the debt was allegedly purchased before the (..)
BANK ACCUSED IN FDCPA CLASS ACTION OF USING STRAW LAWFIRM TO COLLECT ON DEBT A patsy. A class action lawsuit is accusing a bank of using a lawfirm as a front to collect on its own debts, allegedly violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act by sending … The post Daily Digest – May 5.
A District Court judge handling a lawsuit filed by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau against a collectionlawfirm for allegedly violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act has decided to stay the case until after the Supreme Court issues a ruling in a case challenging the constitutionality of a federal agency being run by … The post (..)
A collectionlawfirm in Virginia is being sued for allegedly violating the FairDebtCollection Practices Act by misrepresenting the amount of attorney involvement in drafting collection letters and for charging “unreasonable” fees to individuals who do not pay their rent.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 19,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content