This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Today’s webinar just happens to be on the topic of legal collections (register here) so it’s entirely timely to write about a court ruling involving a judgment. The debt originated from a judgment obtained back in December 2008.
A collection attorney in New York is facing a class-action lawsuit for allegedly violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and state law when attempting to collect on judgments owed to a bankrupt for-profit university.
A collection operation is facing a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act class action lawsuit for not adjusting the post-judgment interest rate after the state of Kentucky changed the maximum rate that could be charged seven years ago, according to a copy of the complaint.
The Governor of New York last week signed a bill into law that will lower the interest rate that can be charged on unpaid money judgments to 2%. The law not only applies to new judgments, but also will be applied retroactively to any judgment that is not fully paid or satisfied when the law … The post N.Y.
The collection of post-judgment interest is in the news, and is being cited as a relic of “a different era” which can cost the amount of debt owed by an individual to “balloon in a way that makes it hard to” repay.
A report issued last week by the National Consumer Law Center grades each state on its exemption laws, which determine how much consumers can protect from judgments and garnishments, determining that none of the 50 states or other territories meet what the organization defines as the five basic standards.
Better late than never, a federal judge in Nevada has ruled, denying a motion for default judgment against a defendant in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case because the defendant has now starting to defend itself “in earnest.” ” A copy of the ruling in the case of Hankerson v.
A District Court judge in Indiana has granted a motion to vacate a default judgment that was entered against a defendant in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case, ruling that the plaintiff never properly served the defendant with the summons and complaint, after the defendant removed the case to federal court.
A District Court judge in North Carolina has granted a defendant’s motion for relief from judgment on the grounds that a default judgment obtained by the plaintiff in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case is void due to lack of service of process. A copy of the ruling in the case of Becvar v.
A District Court judge in Nevada has dismissed – with prejudice – a plaintiff’s class-action complaint that a defendant violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act by filing renewals for a judgment on an untimely basis, ruling that the defendant renewed the judgments within the window set forth by state law.
The Michigan Court of Appeals has upheld the dismissal of a post-judgment interest class-action on the grounds that state law in Michigan that precludes “actions” based on claimed violations of statutes that permitted recovery of statutory damages in lieu of actual damages means the plaintiff lacks standing to sue.
In a case that was defended by the team at Malone Frost Martin, the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has affirmed a lower court’s summary judgment ruling in favor of a defendant that was sued for violating the Fair Credit Reporting Act for accessing an individual’s credit information via a soft inquiry for … The post Appeals (..)
A District Court judge in Pennsylvania has certified a class action in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act lawsuit that accused a defendant of violating the statute by mentioning in a letter that a judgment may be awarded before the expiration of a settlement offer that was being made, even though a collection lawsuit had … The post Judge Certifies (..)
She sought damages for these alleged injuries, asserting violations of the FDCPA: A District Court judge granted summary judgment for the defendant, ruling that the interest rate the defendant attempted to collect did not constitute a violation of the FDCPA.
It appears as though Douglas MacKinnon has successfully avoided being sent to jail, even though a two-day hearing this week did not provide all the details that prosecutors and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau are looking for as they seek to enforce a $60 million judgment against him.
A trio of credit unions from Western New York yesterday filed a class-action complaint seeking an expedited hearing in an attempt to block a new law from going into effect that lowers the maximum rate of post-judgment interest that can be charged in the state to 2%, from 9% currently. appeared first on AccountsRecovery.net.
But sometimes there are entries on a credit report that make determining whether seven years has past or not more difficult than it would … The post Appeals Court Affirms Summary Judgment for Defendant in FCRA Case appeared first on AccountsRecovery.net.
An Appeals Court in Washington state has reversed a lower court’s ruling denying a motion to vacate a default judgment 14 years after it was entered, because the individual was never properly served with a summons and complaint, even though the individual appeared in court at a hearing in the case after the judgment was … The post State (..)
In a case that was defended by Rick Perr and Monica Littman of Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck, a District Court judge in New York has granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a class-action Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case, ruling the plaintiff lacked standing to sue because he did not suffer a concrete … The post Judge (..)
The Attorney General of Arizona on Friday announced that the defendants in a lawsuit filed by its office have reached a consent judgment that will see the defendants pay $1.6 AG Obtains Judgment Banning Collector; Defendants to Pay Up to $1.8M in Fines and Restitution appeared first on AccountsRecovery.net.
In a case that was defended by the team at Malone Frost Martin, a District Court judge has granted a defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings in a Fair Debt Collection Practices class action after alleging that the amount owed listed in a collection letter was lower than it should have been and that … The post Judge Grants Motion (..)
At least that is what a plaintiff unsuccessfully attempted to argue in a Fair … The post Judge Grants Motion for Judgment in Favor of Creditor Sued in FCRA Case appeared first on AccountsRecovery.net. But even standards that are supposed to be considered objective can sometimes be open to interpretation.
A District Court judge in Ohio has granted a defendant’s motion to vacate an entry of default that was filed against it in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case, ruling that the defendant’s failure to respond to the plaintiff’s complaint did not constitute culpable conduct and that the case should be decided on its merits.
A District Court judge in Kentucky has partially granted and partially denied a collection attorney’s motion to dismiss a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act lawsuit, ruling that the attorney’s motion for default judgment in an underlying collection case was “improper” because the plaintiff had filed a response to the suit.
Judge Grants MTD in FDCPA Case Over MVN; NCLC Grades States on Judgment Protections first appeared on AccountsRecovery.net. Judge Grants MTD in FDCPA Case Over MVN; NCLC Grades States on Judgment Protections appeared first on AccountsRecovery.net. The post Daily Digest – December 28.
The post Judge Grants Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment in FDCPA, FCRA Case Over Complaint Sent to Empty Office appeared first on AccountsRecovery.net.
Judge Grants Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment; Proposed Law Would Limit Collections in Florida For Crime-Incurred Debts first appeared on AccountsRecovery.net. Judge Grants Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment; Proposed Law Would Limit Collections in Florida For Crime-Incurred Debts appeared first on AccountsRecovery.net.
Getting to Know Scott Tacke of Kansas Counselors; Appeals Court Affirms Summary Judgment in FCRA Case appeared first on AccountsRecovery.net. It might not seem like it these days, especially thanks to Regulation F, but sense of humor are not automatically erased when someone crosses over to the compliance side of the building.
The Caselaw that Shaped the ARM Industry in 2021; New Law Lowers Judgment Interest in N.Y. And some hope that the case that was the most impactful in 2021 is … The post Daily Digest – January 4. appeared first on AccountsRecovery.net.
Getting to Know Stephanie Platzman-Diamant of Cavalry Portfolio Services; Judge Denies Default Judgment Motion in FDCPA Case appeared first on AccountsRecovery.net. One of the questions has always been “What is one … The post Daily Digest – April 14.
Securing a judgment against a debtor is a significant victory, but the battle doesnt end there. Collecting on that judgment requires finding the money, sometimes by uncovering the debtors assets. This process is known as post-judgment asset discovery. Dont let a judgment slip through your fingers.
Looking to domesticate a judgment in New York and wondering if its worth the expense? Consider the following: Except for judgments obtained for medical services, New York is extremely liberal when it comes to judgment enforcement. New York allows 9% interest on commercial judgments unless otherwise stated in the judgment.
The plaintiffs argued that the defendant’s employees, who were not licensed attorneys, filed lawsuits and pursued judgments to recover unpaid debts, thereby violating New Mexico laws that limit the practice of law to licensed attorneys. Learn more.
You’ve gone through the trouble of obtaining a judgment against a debtor, yet here you are, now facing the frustration of having to find money to collect. By utilizing aggressive, relentless and innovative tactics, ethically allowed under Massachusetts laws, we help clients collect unpaid judgments. Sound familiar?
The court granted a judgment in the amount of $2,028.87. Following the judgment, the court issued an order for wage execution in January 2023, allowing the law firm to garnish the plaintiff’s wages in order to satisfy the debt.
A District Court judge in Maryland has granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case that centers over the language used by the plaintiff and whether it constituted a dispute of the debt or not. I decline to pay this debt.” ” The ruling: Judge Julie R.
A District Court judge in Florida has granted a plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case, ruling that a collection law firm used an invalid garnishment order to collect on the subject debt. The decision, issued by Judge William F.
They allow you to secure assets of the debtor before the court issues a judgment. Attaching real estate to secure your judgment Real estate attachments allow you to place a lien on the debtors property. Let us fight to get you paid.The post How can you secure a debt owed to you before you get a judgment?
A District Court judge in Nevada has granted a defendant’s motion to dismiss after it was accused of garnishing the plaintiff’s wages without first domesticating the judgment in that state. The background: The case stemmed from a consumer credit card debt judgment originally obtained in Tennessee by a creditor.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 19,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content