This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
A District Court judge in New Jersey has granted a defendant’s motion to dismiss a third-party complaint filed against it by a collection lawfirm over issues with a wage garnishment. The background: The dispute began when the plaintiff, a consumer, owed a debt which the lawfirm was assigned to collect.
The Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has upheld a summary judgment ruling in favor of a lawfirm that was accused of violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act by suing an individual who was allegedly responsible for a medical debt incurred by his wife, before they divorced.
A class-action lawsuit has been filed in New Jersey by a plaintiff who claims that a debt buyer allegedly violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act because it did not have the proper license to authorize a collection lawfirm to try and collect on a judgment in that state and that a letter sent … The post FDCPA Class Action Filed Against (..)
A District Court judge in Maryland has granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case that centers over the language used by the plaintiff and whether it constituted a dispute of the debt or not. I decline to pay this debt.” ” The ruling: Judge Julie R.
A District Court judge in Florida has granted a plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case, ruling that a collection lawfirm used an invalid garnishment order to collect on the subject debt. The decision, issued by Judge William F.
Bank, Collection LawFirm Facing FDCPA Class Action Over Reviving Dormant Judgments Judge Denies MSJ For Defendant in FCRA, FDCPA Case Over Disputed Debt More Americans Living Paycheck to Paycheck: Survey A Summary of Comments on Medical Debt Credit Reporting Proposal WORTH NOTING: The best Prime Day deals available so far … The best video […] (..)
” Despite this, the creditor and its lawfirm sent collection letters to the plaintiff between May and November 2023 attempting to collect on the 2007 loan. The lawfirm defendant made a $3,000 offer of judgment in July 2024, which the plaintiff accepted.
BANK ACCUSED IN FDCPA CLASS ACTION OF USING STRAW LAWFIRM TO COLLECT ON DEBT A patsy. A class action lawsuit is accusing a bank of using a lawfirm as a front to collect on its own debts, allegedly violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act by sending … The post Daily Digest – May 5. A scapegoat.
The debt buyer referred the plaintiff’s account to a collection lawfirm to pursue legal action. The debt buyer referred the plaintiff’s account to a collection lawfirm to pursue legal action. In October 2020, MLG filed a collection complaint against the plaintiff in the San Diego Superior Court.
Over time, they neglected to pay the maintenance and cable fees for the property, and the homeowners association hired the defendant, a collection lawfirm, to collect the outstanding fees. Despite the plaintiffs attempts to resolve the situation, including contacting the HOA for payment details, the fees went unpaid.
A District Court judge in Nevada has granted a defendant’s motion to dismiss after it was accused of garnishing the plaintiff’s wages without first domesticating the judgment in that state. The background: The case stemmed from a consumer credit card debt judgment originally obtained in Tennessee by a creditor.
A bankruptcy court judge in Virginia has ordered a collection lawfirm to pay $25,000 in attorney’s fees to the plaintiffs for violating the discharge of a judgment through bankruptcy by sending a payoff letter to the plaintiffs after the plaintiff requested it. A copy of the ruling in the case of Skaggs v.
The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has partially affirmed and partially reversed a lower court’s ruling in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case, determining that the District Court judge should not have granted summary judgment for a collection lawfirm that “expressly” informed an individual in a collection letter that (..)
Judge Awards $25k in Sanctions Against Collection LawFirm; CFPB Launches Credit Card Review first appeared on AccountsRecovery.net. Judge Awards $25k in Sanctions Against Collection LawFirm; CFPB Launches Credit Card Review appeared first on AccountsRecovery.net. The post Daily Digest – January 25.
The Supreme Court of Montana has affirmed a lower court’s ruling against a plaintiff’s attorney who filed suit against a debt collector, another attorney who was hired to collect on a judgment against the plaintiff’s attorney, and a lawfirm that had agreed to have its offices used for a deposition after a judgment was … The (..)
EDITOR’S NOTE: This article is part of a series that is sponsored by WebRecon. WebRecon identifies serial plaintiffs lurking in your database BEFORE you contact them and expose yourself to a likely lawsuit. Protect your company from as many as one in three new consumer lawsuits by scrubbing your consumers through WebRecon first. Want to learn more?
A District Court judge in Michigan has certifies a class in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case accusing a collection lawfirm of charging excessive post-judgment interest on dozens of debt collection lawsuits across the state. The Background: The plaintiffs were each sued by the defendants for unpaid debts.
Merchant of the District Court for the Eastern District of New York issued the ruling, determining that the plaintiff failed to establish sufficient connections between the lawfirm and the state of New York to justify her authority over the defendant. Read on to hear what the experts have to say this week. More details here.
The Attorney General of New York yesterday announced an Assurance of Discontinuance with a collection lawfirm and its subsidiary that will see it pay $655,600 in fines and restitution to consumers.
A District Court judge in Pennsylvania has denied a defendant’s motion to dismiss a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act class action lawsuit, ruling the plaintiff plausibly alleged violations of the statute after the defendant — a collection lawfirm — allegedly edited an account statement to include additional fees.
When obtaining a judgment in a debt collection action and, thereafter, seeking to enforce that judgment, debt collectors must be aware of the EIPA and proceed accordingly. More details here. Defendants are therefore well-advised to carefully analyze complaints for pleading deficiencies.
A judgment is an order issued by a court of law. If they are successful, the court issues a judgment against you. What Happens After a Judgment Is Entered Against You? The court enters a judgment against you if your creditor wins their claim or you fail to show up to court. These laws vary. Property levies.
The Florida Supreme Court has published the proper form to use when seeking a final judgment of foreclosure: Form 1.996(a), Final Judgment of Foreclosure (8-18-20). What Does Form 1.996(a), Final Judgment of Foreclosure, Include? Plaintiffs in Hillsborough county must use the Uniform Final Judgment of Foreclosure form.
That said, let me walk you through all the elements of this particular email that tip it off as a scam: From: Sherrill Green <SherrillGreen@outlook.com> Wait, the prestigious “Webster LawFirm” doesn’t have it’s own domain and you’re using a generic outlook.com account? Attorney at Law?
In the event the dispute evolves into a lawsuit, the business judgment rule will protect directors from personal liability so long as they did not breach their fiduciary duty. Application of Business Judgment Rule to Community Associations. As a result, disputes sometimes arise between the association and its members. In Miller v.
A District Court judge in Arizona has granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case, ruling that it is entitled to the statute’s bona fide error defense after garnishing a bank account where Social Security payments were deposited to satisfy a judgment.
A District Court judge in Arizona has granted a defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case, ruling that it is entitled to the statute’s bona fide error defense after garnishing a bank account where Social Security payments were deposited to satisfy a judgment.
Capouano, Beckman, Russell & Burnett LLC , the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit recently affirmed defendant lawfirm Capouano, Beckman, Russell & Burnett LLC’s (Firm) motion for summary judgment involving an alleged violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA).
A judgment is an order issued by a judge or jury to settle a lawsuit. In this case, the judge may order you to pay the other party as part of the court’s final judgment. The order can be issued in one of two forms: A monetary judgment: A judgment that orders one party to pay the other party a specific amount of money.
5082, officially known as the “Practice of Law Technical Clarification Act of 2018,” to the full House of Representatives. Dunn The House Financial Services Committee voted 35-25 on March 21, 2018 to advance H.R.
In this case, a credit-reporting agency defending an FCRA case issued subpoenas to a consumer lawfirm to determine whether that firm was acting as a credit-repair organization and to learn about its process for creating and sending dispute letters on behalf of consumers. More details here.
A District Court judge in Wisconsin has denied a defendant’s motion for summary judgment after it was sued for allegedly violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act because it attempted … The post Judge Denies Defendant’s MSJ in FDCPA Case Seeking to Collect on Canceled Debt appeared first on AccountsRecovery.net.
When a debtor owes a creditor money and the creditor is seeking assistance collecting the amount owed, the creditor can either use a collection lawfirm or a collection agency. Lawfirms and collection agencies serve the same purpose initially.
On February 13, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of an Eastern District of New York court and found that the defendant lawfirm, Mandarich Law Group, LLC (Mandarich), had conducted a meaningful attorney review of the plaintiff debtor’s account prior to mailing her a debt collection letter on the firm’s letterhead.
A District Court judge in Minnesota has denied a defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act class-action lawsuit, ruling that there were genuine issues of material fact in dispute regarding whether the defendant lawfirm qualifies as a debt collector under the FDCPA and whether its actions violated the statute. (..)
As the court observed, the percentage of the lawfirm’s business devoted to collections had little bearing on whether it “regularly” collected debts on behalf of another and the lack of record evidence bearing on that point was no grounds for granting the lawfirm summary judgment.
WHAT THIS MEANS, FROM STACY RODRIGUEZ OF ACTUATE LAW: After a collection lawfirm garnished an Arizona judgment debtor’s bank account, the debtor raised FDCPA claims alleging that all funds in the account were social security benefits and, thus, exempt from garnishment. More details here.
Real estate attachments are a type of pre-judgment attachment. That means you secure the asset before you receive the judgment against the debtor. The debtor cannot transfer that asset while the judgment case is underway. Once you receive your judgment, you have an asset set aside which may pay the debt.
But how often must a lawyer or a lawfirm engage in consumer debt collection activities before they are subject to the Act? This question has taken on increasing importance in recent years as more lawfirms have integrated collection work into their existing practices. See Wadas , 2013 WL 3928631, at *5. Frankel , 197 F.3d
District Court for the Southern District of California, granting summary judgment in favor of a debt collector in a Fair Debt Collections Practices Act (FDCPA) case. The plaintiff, Jeffrey Almada, allegedly owed money to a homeowner’s association, which retained the defendant, the Krieger LawFirm, A.P.C. Krieger , No.
Partnering with a lawfirm that has a reputation for ethical debt collection can help to ensure that collection efforts are both effective and compliant with the law. Our collections attorneys help our commercial clients file pre-judgment attachments, file a mechanic’s lien whenever applicable and collect on court judgments.
When consumers returned the calls, the defendants falsely claimed to be from a mediation or lawfirm, again threatened legal action, and used consumers’ personal information to convince consumers the threats were real.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 19,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content