Consumer Financial Services Law

MARCH 15, 2019

In 2016, the bank engaged the defendant law firm to foreclose on the underlying real property. The law firm then sent Ms. fka Standard Federal Bank has retained our law firm to begin foreclosure proceedings on the above referenced property. Tyler sued the law firm, claiming the letter violated 15 U.S.C.

Bankruptcy 40

Bankruptcy Foreclosure Law Firms Creditors 40

Troutman Sanders

FEBRUARY 1, 2022

The plaintiff, Jeffrey Almada, allegedly owed money to a homeowner’s association, which retained the defendant, the Krieger Law Firm, A.P.C. Emphasis in the original). In doing so, it held that a collection letter, which indicated that the debtor could only dispute the underlying debt in writing, violated the FDCPA.

Debt collector 59

Debt collector Judgment Fair Debt Collection Debtor 59

Katabat

JANUARY 24, 2020

The conference, occurring February 3–6, 2020, brings together key participants in the receivables management industry, including debt buying companies, collection agencies, collection law firms, brokers, originating creditors, and affiliates.

Debt Buying 40

Debt Buying Law Firms Collection Agencies Collections Agency 40

Better Credit Blog

APRIL 3, 2022

In other words, when the original creditor has been unsuccessful in collecting on a debt, it will write off the debt as a loss. There’s a chance some details about your account got lost in the transfer from the original creditor. I suggest you check out Lexington Law. How Portfolio Recovery Associates Works.

Debt collector 87

Debt collector Collection Agencies Collections Agency Garnishment 87

The McHughes Law Firm

JULY 12, 2016

It’s important to remember that the unpaid debt has passed through the original creditor to a debt collection attorney. If you have been contacted by McHughes Law Firm concerning an outstanding debt , call us today at (501) 376-9131 and begin the necessary steps to resolve the debt you owe.

Collections 40

Collections Law Firms Garnishment Original Creditor 40

FDCPA Defense

AUGUST 22, 2016

Hollins Law Firm , _F.3d There, the collection law firm defendant communicated with plaintiff on a number of occasions, and each time the firm identified itself as a “debt collector,” as required by section 1692e(11) of the FDCPA. iii] A striking example of this trend is the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Davis v.

Debtor 40

Debtor Debt collector Law Firms Accrued Interest 40

FDCPA Defense

JANUARY 28, 2012

Debt buyers are being sued based on the conduct of their agencies and law firms. Even original creditors, who are not subject to the FDCPA, are being drawn into FDCPA litigation under various theories of recovery. For this reason, original creditors are not subject to the FDCPA (except in very limited circumstances).

Debt collector 40

Debt collector Retrieval Original Creditor Creditors 40

Consumer Financial Services Law

JANUARY 3, 2018

ARS sent a letter to Islam on August 11, 2016 stating, in relevant part, that “[a]s of the date above, you owe $14,413.78.”

Accrued Interest 40

Accrued Interest Debt collector Banks Creditors 40

FDCPA Defense

MARCH 2, 2014

One method for identifying areas of potential concern, however, is to analyze the recent enforcement actions by the CFPB and other regulators filed against debt buyers and original creditors. Enforcement actions filed against original creditors can also provide guidance to debt buyers and other collectors about areas of CFPB concern.

Debtor 40

Debtor Banks Original Creditor Collections 40

BN Lawyers

JUNE 12, 2020

Since accounts are not typically transferred directly between debt collectors, this means debt buyers and original creditors must be able to both receive the information and provide it to the subsequent debt collector. Notably, this information is required to be transferred when the account is transferred to another debt collector.

Government 52

Government Debt collector Collections Creditors 52

FDCPA Defense

JANUARY 22, 2017

2014) (collection complaints violated the FDCPA where they identified incorrect “original” creditor that had made the loans to class members); McCollough v. 2011) (service of requests for admission on pro se defendant seeking admissions that law firm knew were false violated FDCPA). 3d 1109 (9th Cir. Johnson, et al.,

Collections 40

Collections Judgment Creditors Law Firms 40